As I wrote, not really - at their 'expense' only in the sense that politicians will excuse their lack of investment in that field with high-speed rail, i.e. "see there, I spent x billions on rail".
From this railwayman's perspective, both are needed, high-speed networks and investment into the old network (mainlines AND branchlines).
BTW, you might be interested, I wrote a diary about my view on rail 'reforms' in the EU. *Traitor*, n. A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
Must have been the dark atmosphere.
Today's hyper-ugly Penn Station has 11+1 platforms with 21 parallel tracks. Köln Hbf only has 6 platforms (tough maybe wider ones) and 11 tracks.
Demolishing the old Penn Station is said to have been a first-order architectural crime - judging from the photos in the link, that appears to be true. *Traitor*, n. A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
We did this with a friend in a small station, but on 1st of April.
You may also add to your diary that the State owned swiss railway (SBB/CFF/FFS) is not loosing money anymore : +24.0 mio CHF in 2003 +42.6 mio CHF in 2004
So all in all, I think you Swiss quite rightly spend as much money on both new and old railways as the Germans and French should have spent, too - yours is a model, the best model to follow. (To a lesser degree, Spain too.) *Traitor*, n. A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.