Display:
Yes both networks are needed, but at present time, it is impossible to build and maintain both. Switzerland is doing well only because it hasn't any plan for high speed train (if you except the Swissmetro, the very fast, > 500 km/h, underground train). It can just afford to slowly improving it's regular railway network (Bahn2000,Base tunnels, Pendolino).

You may also add to your diary that the State owned swiss railway (SBB/CFF/FFS) is not loosing money anymore :
+24.0 mio CHF in 2003
+42.6 mio CHF in 2004

by Hansvon on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 04:15:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, not 300 km/h, but the 250 km/h Cisalpino trains can be counted as high speed. They will be able to attain that speed on both NEAT lines and (if the signalling system is ready) the Mattstetten-Rothrist Bahn2000 line - which aren't mere improvements, but capacity increases by adding parallel tracks. And this in a country without far-from-each-other multi-million cities to connect like Paris and Lyons. Also, the costs of the Gotthard NEAT line are well beyond that of a non-Alpine 300 km/h high-speed line say between Zürich and Bern.

So all in all, I think you Swiss quite rightly spend as much money on both new and old railways as the Germans and French should have spent, too - yours is a model, the best model to follow. (To a lesser degree, Spain too.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 09:53:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series