That's the paper that first wrote about the scandal. I found a cryptic line in an article that "it is considered Fidesz's voice in Romania", which is rather strange - could it be a paper of the Hungarian minority written in Romanian?
Also, what can you tell me about Szatmári Ildikó's effect in Transsylvania? I do not trust right-wing papers' claims (especially since they bought into some forgeries in previous scandals), while the nominally left-wing press (which I don't trust that much either) and the only paper that I would term neutral (HVG) didn't research that angle much. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.