Display:
Nomad, I have linked to that report (in pdf form - beware, it's huge), and gave the relevant page number. It is the Senate Whitewash Report of summer 2004, which utterly failed to hold the Bush government accountable - hence I compared it to the Hutton report, which tried to whitewash Bliar.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 11:01:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Over 1 year old? Why would it be surprising that after 1 year of investigating a special counsel would have uncovered evidence contradicting the Congressional report? I mean, Fitzgeral has a reputation for being relentless. Even conservatives do not question his ability and honesty.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 11:07:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
????

The relevance of that report in question is to the claim that Wilson lied, not anything Fitzgerald does. That is a separate question - the Bushites now spin as if Woodward's knowledge proves that Plame's identity was generally known to reporters, known before Libby started to talk about it. Which is bunk on its own, of course. What's interesting is that Woodward's informer (who doesn't think it was Cheney?) was willing to talk on his own to Fitzgerald - he either feels very secure for some reason, or feels endangered even more for another reason.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 11:21:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Forgot to add: the reason that Fitzgerald couldn't uncover Woodward is most probably that Woodward didn't tell anyone. Which goes nicely against the Republican spin on the story.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 11:22:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... Got so irked by the earlier responses that wove away the discussion that I missed the relevance of your post; I thought you were linking to the Hutton report. Nice way of me looking silly, posting directly underneath yours.

Thanks for your post DoDo; that was the kind of response I was looking for.

by Nomad on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 08:39:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It may still have been flippant - I didn't have had the nerve to go into details over something I earlier saw covered to death. But below you find wchurchill going into details, and this time me too in my debunking.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Nov 18th, 2005 at 07:55:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series