Display:
diary, the sources are the US Government web site for the full senate report, and WaPo for Wilson's article, among others.  I don't take this kind of argument seriously of course, I mean "hey, you're just a right wing idiot using neocon talking points"--what does that mean?  It usually means I can't confront your logic, so I'll call you names.
by wchurchill on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
Or it could mean that these accusations have been around long enough that they've been discussed and debunked until everyone's simply exhausted and nauseated by the whole thing and then they start wondering why on earth anyone would post a diary on a site populated by people that may be left or liberal or moderate or progressive or whatever else but are certainly united in a dislike of the Bush Administration and the tactics of the right and so it just seems odd or trollish or offensive that someone would present this diary not as an academic inquiry but with seeming joy and veritable gloating and then they get sort of pissed off.

It could be that.

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes

by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 01:17:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
.
I like that statement: Ad hominem attack on diary, great!

I believe many persons have been involved in the excellent series of investigative journalism at dKos :: CIA leak case of Valerie Plame and attempt to smear Joe Wilson by the WHIG team of Bush-Cheney neocon cabal.

Oui aka creve coeur and new creve coeur @dKos.

To return to Kindergarten for a rehash is not my cup of tea.

  ««  click on pic for info Joe Wilson

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
 

▼▼▼ READ MY DIARY

by Oui on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 03:56:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series