Display:
thanks for the welcome Jerome.  I basically agree with your statement.  The law was written to protect our CIA undercover agents overseas, and then protect them for an additional five years when they get back.  I don't think the CIA is really susposed to have undercover agents over here--that's more the FBI,,,,though I guess with the Patriot Act, maybe that has changed.  But I don't think that when the law was written, lawmakers had undercover CIA domestic agents in mind.
by wchurchill on Thu Nov 17th, 2005 at 06:50:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Her cover involved working for a front company. She was in the process of leaving that cover. But she still traveled over seas under her "cover" within the last 5 years.

So technically, no, she was not "living overseas" but she was still operating under cover and had an identity and contacts that needed protection as she made the long switch back to stateside life.

Regardless, as Fitz said repeatedly, her status was classified, she worked in the NOC division of the CIA and very FEW people knew about it.

by spiderleaf on Sat Nov 19th, 2005 at 01:29:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That, and revealing her also unmasked the CIA cover firm she 'worked in', which was even bigger damage than just revealing Plame.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Nov 19th, 2005 at 03:57:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Exactly. We have no idea how many other agents were using Brewster Jennings as a front company.
by spiderleaf on Sat Nov 19th, 2005 at 03:03:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series