Display:
the party is currently suffering from a split in philosophy and course between the older and the younger generation. The older generation, those who kick-started the party, are saying the party should stay its old course; let's call them the traditionalists. The younger, more progressive generation are saying that the party needs to re-invent itself to keep a credible face; let's call those the modernists. Personally, I'm starting to favour the modernist view more and more which is focussed on a more social policy within a liberal world and strives for better health care, education and transformation of the way how politics are done. This is of course typical as the D66 party now poll only 3 seats if elections were held today. The ideological tussle between the members doesn't help, and the participation of the D66 in the current administration does not reflect well on them either. So yes, I think they got punished for selling out.
by Nomad on Sun Nov 20th, 2005 at 04:58:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd split the party in a realpolitik wing, cq. find a reason to stay relevant after losing their 'crown jewels', and more principled politicians who don't see the reason of being when you have no real guiding philosophy left (D66 wanted to modernise the political system- choose mayors, PM, binding referenda).

Problem is that most of the 'principled' voters have bailed ship, making the case for the realpolitikers much easier. If D66 doesn't find a new face, the party is gone as a national political party of consequence- 3 seats is just too little.

The charm of D66 used to be that is was a true moderate party- progressive on social issues, more conservative on fiscal issues. They also have a certain air, a sense of reason in their candidates- call it intellectualism- that made it appealing for the better educated. This is the reason that they won 17 seats in 1994- the year the Christians were decapitized. They've lost that appeal now they have helped Balkenende II (his second government) in power.

All kind of old celebrity politicians from the past, from old leaders to founders, have argued that D66 really doesn't have any reason for being anymore. It was never intented as a regular political party- they wanted to shake up politics, make it more transparant- better. But try tell that to people who spent their life working themselves up the ranks :)

by koenzel (koen@vanschie.net) on Sun Nov 20th, 2005 at 07:59:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series