Display:
I'm not talking so much about charitable donations as about lifting economic sanctions and allowing trade.

The same people who want to boycott certain African countries rightly point out the human costs of the UN sanction regime on Iraq in the 1990's.

Strangulating the people is not the way to weaken an authoritarian regime. You need to strengthen the people, and the regime will only be weakened by exchange with the outside world.

You don't have to treat Mugabe like a democrat, just don't institute policies that will make the Zimbabwean people more dependent on handouts from his government.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Nov 21st, 2005 at 11:15:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You've got a good point, the problem is that many 'bad' countries won't allow direct aid to their inhabitants because they see that it would destroy their position. And i talked about trade, even though it would benefit us all, it will take away some jobs and might lead to less taxes.

The question how to help the inhabitants of countries run by dictators is extremely difficult. When I look at Zimbabwe, I would almost favor regime-change. Almost.

by koenzel (koen@vanschie.net) on Mon Nov 21st, 2005 at 02:34:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... you mean armed, international intervention?

Well, I already crossed that line with Mugabe. I'd welcome intervention. The only reason that 5 million people haven't died is because emigrants in South Africa uphold them with food and money fluxes. And then there are the damn Chineses... Good grief, this subject makes me angry.

by Nomad on Mon Nov 21st, 2005 at 05:06:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series