Display:
The reason I didn't mention 9/11 is because that was not an objective of the Iraqi invasion. It was just a useful event with which to (further) obscure the real motivations.

Most people think that there was a neo-con plan in place much before Bush was elected. The most common source of this is the Project for a New American Century thank tank established in 1997.

A paper stating their objectives came out in 2000, but is based upon work that was done by members of the group as early as 1993.

If you want to read their manifesto (before it disappears again) here is a link:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

The list of participants reads like a who's who of the neo-con intelligentsia (see last page of document).

Most wars can ultimately be traced back to resource control, there is no reason to think that this one is any different.


Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Sat Dec 10th, 2005 at 04:07:06 PM EST
Actually, I think Cheney and Wolfowitz were working on such plans as early as 1992.  Recall Rumsfeld wantingto bomb Iraq, instead of Afghanistan, after 9/11, too, as Richard Clarke wrote of in Against All Enemies.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Sat Dec 10th, 2005 at 05:15:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Occasional Series