Display:
I wonder if narrow-gauge railways should be considered another kind of failed design.  What I heard was that they enjoyed a sort of faddish popularity in the latter part of the nineteenth century due to their lower construction costs, but that the narrowness of the gauge so restricted potential engine power (by cutting down on the maximum width of the locomotive) that they could never achieve anything close to the efficiency of normal-gauge railroads, ultimately leading to the closing of lines or an upgrade to normal gauge track.

A while ago, I saw another example of a very obviously failed design on Japanese television.  It seemed to be a program on great inventors in Japan, and this episode focused on a man who worked in transportation.  One of his projects was ultra-high speed rail via rocket power.  They showed footage of several small-scale tests he did in the 50's or 60's, with rockets blasting small capsules across fairly short lengths of track.  I couldn't follow the whole program due to my rather limited Japanese, but it seemed like people lost interest in the idea once the Shinkansen bullet trains proved successful.

Finally, on the subject of failed designs, what do people think about magnetic levitation trains?  Despite rather consistent efforts in a few places (China I know has a line from Pudong airport to Shanghai, one that I hear never runs - I've heard something about Germany making efforts in this field as well, but don't know much), I have not heard about a functional commercial mag-lev line.  

Sorry for the late post, but being in Japan, the time difference makes it kind of hard . . .

by Zwackus on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 06:57:07 AM EST
The problem for narrow gauge railways I know of was not motive power: due to smaller amounts to transport, that was not a big issue. The problem is the need to reload: if you have to reload into a standard-gauge wagon after just 20 km, why not transport it on trucks all the way? So surviving narrow gauge with freight transport usually carries normal freight wagons piggyback (i.e., either on special flat cars that have normal gauge rails on them, or on special bogies that are pushed under each axle of the normal wagon).

On the other hand, some narrow gauge railways live on fine as regional transporters or tourists: in Switzerland, there are whole networks.

As for Japanese rocket trains: thanks, never heard of this! I only know that the absolute high-speed record on rails is held by rocket sledges at a US rocket test facility. In 2003, the record was increased, it now stands at Mach 8.5 / 6416 mph / 10325 km/h.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 07:53:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The whole theory behind the Colorado Midland was to avoid the reloading process. A resulting problem was the high operating cost of a standard gauge railroad in the mountains.
by asdf on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 08:27:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry, I was a bit too busy to follow up on this. Yes! There was a college engineering professor who invented a rocket propelled grena...no, train. I will post a link if I find any.

I will become a patissier, God willing.
by tuasfait on Wed Dec 21st, 2005 at 03:41:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I hope you'll find a link before the diary slips from the frontpage right-hand bar!

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Dec 21st, 2005 at 06:10:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He can always find the diary by clicking on your name, DoDo, it's not like you'll disappear.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Dec 21st, 2005 at 06:17:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He can, but others may not - including myself :-)

(I totally forgot to check comments to my October Revolution frontpage story once it slipped, for example...)

DoDo, it's not like you'll disappear.

With that name, are you sure? ;-)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Dec 21st, 2005 at 06:25:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What a shame. I couldn't find any link. The professor was a former army aviation designer. I saw a documentary about his adventure decades ago. The thing was really fast, much too fast for frogs and turtles on board (some of them died when the thing crashed once).

I will become a patissier, God willing.
by tuasfait on Thu Dec 22nd, 2005 at 01:09:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I shortly wrote about them in the comments of the Fastest Speed diary, and again in the Trainwreck diary (see links at the end of this diary), but here is a more basic summary for you (and whoever else cares).

Serious maglev development was done in Japan and Germany. That the former holds the world speed record (at 581 km/h = 361 mph) is due to a longer test line, the German technology (Transrapid) is more advanced. The Pudong to Shanghai line is the first and only commercial Transrapid, it reaches a scheduled 430 km/h (267.2 mph) even on its short strech.

As far as I know, the Shanghai Maglev does run (this November 30, its service was even extended), but rather empty (5 million passengers in 3 years): ticket is expensive, yet the end station is at a metro station in a suburb, so not very practical. The Shanghai authorities spared a tunnel under the city - and the project was expensive enough without it. Cost is also the reason plans to build a line in Germany failed so far (first it was to be Berlin-Hamburg, later across the Ruhr area, now to connect Munich with its airport - but even the latter could fail).

As I wrote in my earlier diaries, I am negative about maglev. It is a superior technology (tough not as superior as in some PR - the latest high-speed trains have come closer in acceleration, while have a better ride quality), but its track is very expensive. And another disadvantage is that while high-speed trains can continue to destinations on conventional lines (at least in Europe - but Japan also has three-track slow lines with Shinkansens), you'd have to build maglev tracks everywhere to offer similar service.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 08:29:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BTW, would my American readers here have difficulties if I stopped giving every figure both in metric and Imperial?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 08:30:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, as long as we can describe curvature in terms of degrees per 100 foot chord!
by asdf on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 08:25:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I did some searching on passenger numbers of the Transrapid Shanghai - and they look somewhat better. The first of its three years in service was only pilot operation, with 0.5 million passengers. For April 2004, I saw daily figures of 4000, so the second year's total must have been around 1.5 million - leaving 3 million for this year. That's some improvement, tough still a far cry from the originally predicted 10 million (and fares were reduced, so the income must be an even smaller part of the planned).

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 03:56:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You probably know this crazy project of a high-speed train running at 600 km/h in low-pressure tunnels ? Two tunnels were planned: Geneva-Sankt Gallen (about 250 km) and Basel-Bellinzona (200 km).
by Hansvon on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 02:21:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How far was that project advanced? Was it just wild phantasizing by an engineer put out to the press, or were politicians discussing it, or were there even feasibility studies prepared - and (if yes failed I suppose) referendums on it?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 02:51:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Prof. M. Jufer from EPFL did start the project in 1992. Several feasibility studies were paid through the Swiss Confederation. The last one (Projekt HISTAR II, mostly computer simulations) ended last September with encouraging results.
A postulat is asking the Swiss Government for further funding (about 1/1000 of the transportation budget, about 7 mio CHF/5 mio €) for the year 2006-2008. Decision will be made next spring.
by Hansvon on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 06:02:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Wow! And I was thinking the project is dead!

What are the currently projected costs? Considering the cost of €10 billion for altogether 100 km of tunnels in NEAT, I'd expect something like €50 billion at least, but maybe there are economies of scale and spared elements (track for one)?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Dec 20th, 2005 at 06:52:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The cost for the pilot between Geneva and Lausanne (60 km) will be about 2.5 mia CHF (1.7 mia €). I've seen the following figure for the whole project: between 25 and 28 mia CHF (18 mia €), split as 13 mia CHF for the line between Geneva and Sankt-Gallen, and 12-15 mia CHF for the line between Basel and Bellinzona.
For comparison, Rail 2000 was 7.4 mia CHF and Alptransit 14 mia CHF.
by Hansvon on Wed Dec 21st, 2005 at 10:46:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
25 and 28 mia CHF (18 mia €)

Whoa - much cheaper than I thought! (BTW, in English, there is no Milliarde - these uneducated barbarians call it a billion :-))

For comparison, Rail 2000 was 7.4 mia CHF and Alptransit 14 mia CHF.

Planned - the former was put into service after remaining waaay below budget (CHF 5.9 billion), but the latter became more expensive (due to inflation, project changes and some geologic problems), now projected to cost CHF 16.40 billion (€10.55 billion) in the end.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Dec 21st, 2005 at 11:09:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
With the Red Dirt in My Ear
by de Gondi - Sep 6
7 comments

The Doctrine of Preemption Comes Home
by danps - Sep 6
5 comments

Not to be read by Americans!!!!
by Martin - Sep 5
81 comments

Take the Load off Fannie....
by ChrisCook - Sep 6
11 comments

I don't do charity, except...
by Jerome a Paris - Sep 6
2 comments

Friday Photography Blog No.51
by In Wales - Sep 5
104 comments

The Withering of Labour
by Helen - Sep 4
18 comments

LQD: Loss Wish?
by ChrisCook - Sep 3
4 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series
Agriculture
by afew - Sep 2

Anglo Disease
by Migeru - Sep 2