I am thinking of Social Democracy as an offspring of Marxism that limits redistribution to members of a nation, as opposed to redistribution on higher levels.
That seems like a strange point of view? Sounds like a story topic to me.
(1) I may want to do research,
(2) currently there is too much other discussion going on, and not the right time to be provocative to a wider audience. (I was already straddling the limit with our Norwegian friends here :-) but they shot me down finely.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
