Display:
Excellent post - I heard only little of the initial troubles you mention, yet I never expected the DLR to be this successful! And, oh, now that you mention:

For the first time there is a direct rail link to the London City Airport currently from Canary Wharf. The line will eventually cross the river to Woolwich in SE London. A likely second link will be built to directly connect to Stratford to serve the Olympics site.

Jérôme will have no excuse for not using mass transit into the City - especially when the DLR station at Stratford International (Eurostar station opening 2007) is built too :-)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:04:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Stratford already has a DLR station.

Jérôme, it takes only 2h50' from Waterloo to Gare du Nord, and the return ticket costs only £59. When are we meeting?

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:09:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Stratford already has a DLR station.

Yes, but SI is not close a DLR extension right to the railway station is planned for 2010. (This is a typical example of public transport investment idiocy I get mad about: when some new rail line is built without organising traffic connections at the same time. But better late than never!)

Jérôme, it takes only 2h50' from Waterloo to Gare du Nord, and the return ticket costs only £59. When are we meeting?

Actually, some trains (those with less stops) are now scheduled at 2h35m! But Jérôme IIRC once explained that his firm pays him the airplane ticket, and going to City Airport is still faster than the Eurostar even with the new CTRL-1-allowed times. (I saw that comment of his maybe a week late, so only answered it indirectly, now for the second time :-) )

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:25:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
2h35'? Taking into account the time difference I can get up at 7 and be in Paris by 9:30! Cool!

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:31:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, the timezone benefit is the other way around :-)

Examples, using the Eurostar site timetable (due to a silly script, sorry no direct link), at-or-around 2h35m trains are:

London-Paris:

  • 9008 (08:12L - 11:47P)
  • 9018 (10:40L - 14:17P)
  • 9040 (16:12L - 19:47P)
  • 9046 (17:42L - 21:17P)

Paris-London:
  • 9003 (06:22P - 07:58L)
  • 9019 (10:19P - 11:54L)
  • 9039 (15:19P - 16:54L)
  • 9055 (19:19P - 20:54L)

...while half of the rest has times just above 2h40m.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 07:42:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I always fly to City Airport, it's really convenient - and will be even more so with the light railway. I've been following construction for the past two years and waiting for this. Great!

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Dec 6th, 2005 at 05:37:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Occasional Series