European Tribune

Display:
This article on Yahoo News reports that China is building a strategic crude oil reserve.  Over the next five years its capacity is expected to rise to 101 million barrels.  Just filling that up will consume 100,000 barrels per day (that's equal to the production from a mid-sized oil field) every day for nearly three years.
by corncam on Mon Jun 27th, 2005 at 12:01:16 PM EST
This is as good a place as any to put this quote:


Energy insecurity may spark last scramble for oil

Is China's bid for an American oil mini-major just a reasonable business deal or a serious outbreak of energy insecurity in the country set to become the world's largest economy? In other words, has the final scramble for oil actually started?

(...)

One thing is certain: the bid highlights the common desire of the US and China to achieve energy security. As present and future superpowers, they are reluctant to accept import dependence for so vital a commodity as oil.

In fact, Beijing is also trying to cut oil use, and has dispatched its oil companies far afield to find and produce new oil. But China's thirst for oil - helping drive the crude price over $60 a barrel - is such that it is now also trying to buy reserves on the stock market, as so many western majors have done in recent years. India shows signs of following the same energy security strategy. Both the new Asian giants stand in contrast to Japan.

(...)

n theory, it ought to be irrelevant which or how many sources of oil a country has, because all such sources effectively feed one big pool, the world market, from which everyone buys. In practice, and certainly in war, things are different. Big powers, such as Britain and the US in the last century, felt they needed their own oil to fuel their navies; the UK government once owned BP for this purpose and the US still has its Naval Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. Nowadays the connection is often reversed. The US feels it needs its navy to protect oil supplies and routes.

(...)

In general, owning foreign oil reserves does not increase energy security. Were CNOOC to win Unocal, it could not insist on shipping Unocal's US oil off to China; US law would prevent this. But there are two other possible ways of enhancing energy security. One is through long-term supply contracts, which existed in the energy-anxious 1970s and before the development of the oil futures markets. Opec producers now prefer to play the spot market for the highest price. But it is possible to imagine oil importers of the weight of China and India striking deals where smaller oil consumers could not. The second option is to build up an oil stockpile. China is doing this and India is talking about it.

(...)

In the end, the best energy security money can buy is: money. Oil will go to the highest bidder. When Ali Naimi, oil minister of Saudi Arabia, which holds the world's largest reserves, last year predicted that his country would be the one to produce the last barrel of oil on earth, he did not forecast the nationality of the buyer. But, on present trends, it could be Chinese.



In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Mon Jun 27th, 2005 at 12:33:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Half Time Diary from Tehran
by ChrisCook - Oct 15
20 comments

The Organic Silver BB?
by a siegel - Oct 15
3 comments

A shift of the frame
by DoDo - Oct 15
58 comments

Dow in the Tank-Pump in more $ fast
by NearlyNormal - Oct 15
4 comments

Canadian Federal Election of 2008
by Gary J - Oct 15
12 comments

Gabriele Pauli and the Free Voters
by nanne - Oct 14
38 comments

Global Human Protein Deficit
by SacredCowTipper - Oct 14
8 comments

Who is it that the UK and Spain intend to invade?
by BruceMcF - Oct 14
92 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series