Display:
Two thing jump out to this Anglo-centric ("everything I know about Europe is what I read in The Economist") American.

First, what about Poland? Isn't their agricultural economy pretty big? Do they get the same CAP funding that France gets?

Second, the story in the U.S. press is that Europe is a lot worse than us from the viewpoint of shutting out third world competition. I don't know how to evaluate this, and Bussereau's comments seem kind of self-serving. Are there numbers from the U.N. or World Bank or somebody "neutral" to support his assertion?

by asdf on Fri Jul 15th, 2005 at 01:42:53 PM EST
Poland, like the other accession countries, will get less help per farmer than the "old" members did. They start at 25% of the equivalent, and it is set to grow to 100% of the corresponding help by 2013. This also reflects the fact that standards of living are still lower in these countries.

The revenue of farmers in Poland has increased by about 50% since they joined the EU; more interestingly, Polish ag. exports to the rest of the EU have skyrocketed (whereas there were fears that Western "subsidised" products would overwhelm the Polish market).

As regards US arguments about EU farming, don't forget that the US is just as bad an offender in terms of ag subsidies, and any accusation thrown around is usually self-serving and partial (the same holds true on the EU side, of course). I reply on poor countries below.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 15th, 2005 at 03:20:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Occasional Series