Display:
The oecd site www.oecd.org has tables for each country, click on "browse by country." What's tough is using the numbers to get a fair comparison, and what Chirac is doing is cherry-picking the numbers to try to get political points.

For example, suppose a country spends more money on health care per capita, but has an inefficient or unfair distribution of that spending. Is that better or worse? Or, suppose a country has a low number of average working hours, but a lower per capita GDP. Is that better or worse?

It seems to me that this ongoing "France versus Britain" thing is typical internecine bickering between politicians: Chirac uses evil capitalist England for his political purposes, while Blair uses evil communist France for his political purposes. Meanwhile we've got global warming, third world starvation, an energy crisis, thousands of poorly controlled nuclear weapons, a shooting war...

Typical politics.

by asdf on Fri Jul 15th, 2005 at 08:41:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
not by Chirac - which is the only reason I used them.

You are right that it is very easy to find convenient statistics for almost anything.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 15th, 2005 at 08:59:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"lies, damned lies and statistics" to quote Winston Churchill.

Money is a sign of Poverty - Culture Saying
by RogueTrooper on Fri Jul 15th, 2005 at 10:19:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Occasional Series