Display:
...it is pretty much centrist. They argued for the war in Iraq and are advocating a "reform-agenda" for some time now.

I cancelled my subscription after ten years last year, after the notorious column, which was later quoted in Angela Merkels letter to president Bush offering him her support for the war.

They were the newspaper of the 90's. But they are in constant intellectual and journalistic decline.

by jandsm on Wed Aug 10th, 2005 at 09:37:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was news to me.  Well, they're left to the FAZ, FWIW.

I must admit that I stopped reading newspapers in print for a long time and mostly get my news from radio and internet, so I may not be up-to-date on those matters.  Although, the Spiegel leaving out a qualifier is telling, they do it for a lot of other papers.

by hesk on Wed Aug 10th, 2005 at 09:53:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the early nineties, when I became a news junkie, I started read Spiegel, Newsweek, Time and The Economist. I quickly decided that Spiegel is best by a length (for example, when all others were still optimistic about the I/P peace process, they correctly predicted the course of Barak's future PM-ship even before he was elected party leader), and that the Economist is unbearable. From the time of the second Palestinian Intifada, I increasingly got fed up with the spin and hypocrisy in the two American magazines (something the American Left got a strong sense of only during the Bush era), which worsened during the 2000 elections, and I completely abadoned them in the run-up to the Iraq war. I was left with Spiegel.

However, Spiegel's quality declined strongly after the death of Rudolf Augstein. First there was their complete turn-around on Iraq, publishing excerpts from Kevin Pollack's book, which whitewashed twenty years of US Iraq policy and spun it in an anti-Iraq, anti-UN-inspectors way. Then some articles on asylants that sounded xenophobic. It also seemed that economy articles with a renegade view disappeared. And Henryk M. Broder had room for too many lame articles. But what drew the line for me was wind power. (Yeah, my pet issue.)

IIRC in late spring 2003, SPIEGEL ON-LINE had a great article summing up and debunking all the anti-wind-power spin VDEW, Clement & co began to put forth then. I was anixously waiting for the same article to appear in the paper version. To no avail. Instead, some half a year later, they brought a cover article - reproducing all the debunked spin and 'arguments'! It was a real hatchet job. (I later read one of the authors of the internet article quit SPIEGEL in response.) Their later endorsement for presidential candidate Köhler only underlined my notion. At this point, like you, I became an (almost-)internet-only news reader.

Now, I wonder whether what happened to the Spiegel is the takeover of a different team, or part of a general righward (and dumb-ward) lurch of the whole German media elite. At any rate, I sensed the latter too: jandsm, you say the SZ praises the 'reforms', but so did some articles and editorials I read in the taz!

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Aug 11th, 2005 at 03:55:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I was reading SZ pretty regularly back then. I don't remember them arguing for the war. Quite the opposite. I do remember regular pro-war op-ed type pieces but IIRC they were outweighed by the anti-war ones.  I see SZ as your standard issue 'socio-liberal' paper. Similar to Le Monde in that way.
FWIW my favorite German daily is FAZ - in spite of its annoying conservatism it tends to be the most comprehensive and of the highest quality. Of the weeklies I like Die Zeit. Spiegel has a tabloid quality to it at times which annoys me.
by MarekNYC on Thu Aug 11th, 2005 at 03:11:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Occasional Series