European Tribune

Display:
On the plus side, it means:

  1. That we have a government
  2. That they are not too late it they get busy to finish the bill on judicial reform which is the biggest obstacle that we face on EU membership
  3. They have outlined EU membership and social responsibility as priorities. This means that there will be more attention, we hope, paid to those who have not been doing well through the transition. The rise of the hard right has given an added urgency to address these frustrations of these people.
  4. It's a pretty broad segment of society with a large majority (170 out of 240). This means that a few defections won't cost the government its majority.
  5. A few good ministers in it. Two of my favorites are kept from the last government (Miglena Kuneva as Minister of European Integration and Nickolay Vassilev moves to Minister of Public Administration). Several others I do not know anything about.
  6. EU accession demands will keep this government fairly responsible.

On the minus side, it means:

  1. That we have a government
  2. Many expect that this government will fall the day after Bulgaria enters the EU.
  3. It would have been helpful if there could have been a Grand Coalition with the specific goal of getting us in the EU.
  4. Some characters who have not been very socially responsible (in my view) are behind this project.

The whole experience has delegitimized "democracy" for many.

Some politicians openly speak of "democracy" as something akin to doing favors for your friends.

The right has begun the process of legitimizing the introduction of ethnic slurs and views into the national political discourse. Some see that it gets them votes. This is fairly new to Bulgarian politics.

Some voices on the right have begun to openly question the existence of a successful "Bulgarian ethnic model." This idea had dominated political discourse and helped to keep our politics different from that of the rest of the region.

 

by gradinski chai on Tue Aug 16th, 2005 at 05:22:35 AM EST
Yawn... as in Germany, such a broad left-right coalition serves to strenghten the extremists.

BTW, to link back to that old thread, what about Iraq? Will Simeon's party torpedo the withdrawal decision?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Aug 16th, 2005 at 05:57:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Simeon's NDSV is center/center-left. As for the withdrawal, it should not affect it. The socialists were pretty clear about this, and there is little support for the military presence in Iraq.
by gradinski chai on Tue Aug 16th, 2005 at 06:31:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Center/center-left? Maybe I was misled by assotiationg aristocracy and monarchy with conservatives! But, it could also be relative. What are the leftist elements in its policy? Their positions on minimum vages, privatisation of public services, income tax, culture, and so on?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Aug 16th, 2005 at 08:14:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Many of NDSV's policies are the same old tired IMF-World Bank-US-EU inspired "privatization of everything is good" mantra. But not all...

They are a little more senstive to the impact of some of these policies. Their position on social spending for socially vulnerable populations is center-center left. They realize that sometimes government must be involved in correcting for the market. Not much, mind you, but clearly not complete market worshipers.

by gradinski chai on Tue Aug 16th, 2005 at 08:26:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series