Display:
...enemies long before Saddam Hussein.

''I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes''

Winston Churchill,  Iraq: From Sumer to Sudan, by Geoff Simons

Winston Churchill, as colonial secretary, was sensitive to the cost of policing the Empire; and was in consequence keen to exploit the potential of modern technology. This strategy had particular relevance to operations in Iraq. On 19 February, 1920, before the start of the Arab uprising, Churchill (then Secretary for War and Air) wrote to Sir Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare. Would it be possible for Trenchard to take control of Iraq? This would entail the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death...for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes.

    Churchill was in no doubt that gas could be profitably employed against the Kurds and Iraqis (as well as against other peoples in the Empire): *I do not understand this sqeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHU407A.html

By the 1940s, Churchill was equal opportunity in his zeal to use poison gas as he was ready WMD Germany.

http://www.informationwar.org/state%20terrorism/Britain_using_chemical_weapons.htm

by Grand Poobah on Fri Aug 19th, 2005 at 11:18:59 AM EST
Yes, contrary to myth, Winston Churchill was one of the biggest cynics who could with any justification at all be called a decent man.

The world's northernmost desert wind.
by Sirocco (sirocco2005ATgmail.com) on Fri Aug 19th, 2005 at 03:53:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
By the way, I was once caled upon this quote. I found poison gas didn't turn into the British' first choice, as envisioned by madman Churchill (who was also a zionist anti-semite about this same time: he argued openly that the bolshevik menance could be averted this way...). It was plain old aerial bombing, which was found more effective and 'practical'.

Sometime earlier, I read a little rundown on terror bombing. It didn't start with Guernica. It started thirty years earlier - in North Africa, done by all colonial powers, and even the USA as 'subcontractor' (US pilots flying for the colonial powers).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Aug 19th, 2005 at 06:26:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I found my source. It is an article in the February 2003 issue of the German GEO magazine. Some 'firsts':

1 November 1911: first recorded bomb drop from an airplane in history, by Italian Lt. Giulio Cavotti, against rebelling Arabs near Tripoli.

  1. first French use of aerial bombing, against rebellious Berbers in Morocco.

  2. first Spanish use of aerial bombing, again in Morocco.

Then came WWI. I note that the total of WWI deaths from airplanes, 2000, is dwarfed by the casualties of colonial massacres.

1915-1920: first British aerial bombings in colonies, but then already at grand scale: in India, Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan, Somaliland.

1925: first total destruction of anentire town by aerial bombing, by US pilots hired out to France, against the Moroccan town of Chechaouen: holy site of the Jibala tribe, 6000 inhabitants, none armed.

Then came the bombings in Iraq - and their architect was none other than Arthur "Bomber" Harris. The terrorist total-war mindset behind firebombings (which specifically targeted civilians) weren't without precedent, without a prehistory.

The article also tracks back the ideology of total war (i.e. a war fought between 'nations' at all costs, without making difference between civilians and combattants):

  1. British mathematician P.W. Lanchester proposes the burning of entire cities as a tactic of war.
  2. British politician Winston Churchill proposes the destruction of Berlin with a bombing raid by 1000 airplanes. (He got that, multiple times, two-and-a-half decades later.)
  3. Italian General Guilio Douhet creates the full-blown doctrine of total war.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Aug 20th, 2005 at 08:04:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
May our history-versed American friends help out?

I suspect that the US first also predates WWI, and was most probably in the Philippines.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sat Aug 20th, 2005 at 08:06:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
     Actually, the US lagged behind other colonial powers in this respect, mainly because the Army had no aircraft suitable for bombing before WW1.
     The 1st Aero Squadron (8 planes) was activated in 1913. Three years later the squadron took part in Pershing's Punitive Expedition into northern Mexico.  The planes were Curtiss JN4s, useful for scouting but nothing else. In fact, they weren't even useful for that because within weeks mechanical failures had grounded the entire squadron.  When the US entered WW1 in 1917, the Army possessed only 55 airplanes, 51 of which were unsuitable for combat.
     After WW1 it was a different story.  Marine aviation played a significant role in the Nicaraguan Intervention in the late 20s.  But by then the use of aircraft in colonial wars had become routine.  Here the RAF led the way, using aircraft against insurgents in Afghanistan, Somalia, and (of all places) Iraq.
     There's a good general account of "colonial air control" in a recently published study: Air Power in Small Wars: Fighting Insurgents & Terrorists by James Corum and Wray Johnson.

My mind is aglow with whirling transient nodes of thought careening through a cosmic vapor of invention. -- Hedley Lamarr.
by Angry Blue Planet (jrclio@aol.com) on Sat Aug 20th, 2005 at 08:43:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just as confirmation (fwiw): I remember reading years ago (and am sorry can't produce source), that the first aerial bombings were, as you say, against the Berbers in the Moroccan Rif.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Aug 20th, 2005 at 03:53:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
30 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
11 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
11 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
30 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series