Display:
Half of the seats of the Bundestag are decided winner-takes-all in the districts according to the "first vote" (Erststimme). The other half is divided proportionally over the party lists according to the "second vote" (Zweitstimme). If a party wins a greater share of the districts (Direktmandate "direct mandates") than of the proportional vote, the number of seats in the Bundestags increases by those Ueberhangsmandate. There is of course a fixed number of districts, so you would expect that the number of seats in the Bundestag is that number times two. But it so happens that that's not the way they do it. Don't ask me why...

If you can't convince them, confuse them. (Harry S. Truman)
by brainwave on Sun Sep 18th, 2005 at 04:26:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
there you go then - the reason they don't go with a fixed number of seats (twice the number of voting districts) is that they couldn't guarantee each state a certain share of the proportional vote (the Zweitstimmen) that way. Note though that people have been fussing about the fairness and constitutionality of the Ueberhangsmandate forever.

If you can't convince them, confuse them. (Harry S. Truman)
by brainwave on Sun Sep 18th, 2005 at 04:32:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
because it benefits the big parties.....

no, that is not the reason. but it is disproportionally more difficult for the smaller parties to get a ueberhangmandat, than for the biguns

by PeWi on Sun Sep 18th, 2005 at 04:32:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series