Your comments contain erroneous statements:

1.   theoretical form

(a) The libertarian party is a down-to-earth political party, rathrer than an academic institution engaged in abstract ideas.  Further, it has practical solutions, not theorical essays.

(b) the abolition of all authority (especially state authority) the ideal.
Nobody calls for "abolition" of the state.  In fact, the state is vital, important and must play its role.  However, the state is small and infringes as little as possible to an individual's rights and freedoms.

2.   Neoliberalism, which started with just the one Milton Friedman

(a) If you mean "neoliberalims" as libertarian economic theory, then you are mistaken.  Libertarian economic theory started with and/or include Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Ludwid von Mises (Austria), F. Hayek (Austria), Bastiat (French), etc.
(b) Milton Friedman's name is prominent, in part, because (i) he is a Nobel-Prize winner, (ii) he was Ronald Reagan's economic adviser.

3.  When one has no argument, one always makes ad hominim attacks. (smile)

4.   Friedman and cohorts of the Chicago school took this quite literally: they were flown in to act as economic advisors for military dictator Augusto Pinochet in Chile
   

(a) Friedman did not advise Augusto Pinochet. I doubt he ever met Pinochet.  
(b) Gen. Pinochet chose to fimplement [part of] the libertarian economic plan, and the Chicago School economists advised him.  The tragedy is that Herr Schroeder or Frau Merkel won't ask for their advise. So, God bless them.  They can solve their economic problems with more and more socialist solutions.
Somehow, 12% unemployment hasn't been going down. And Germany's growth rate is unnoticeable. But then, the politicians and bureaucrats know better, don't they? :-)

(c) In 10 years, starting from 1973, Chile  abolished the minimum wage, privatized the pension system, state industries, and banks, and abolished tax on wealth and profits.  As a result, you had a very large middle class, compared to other Latin American nations.  As a result, when people get economic rights, they also demand political rights, which they eventually got. However, Pinochet did not fully implement the libertarian plan.  

(In fact, John F. Kennedy (Dem), and Ronald Reagan (Rep) both cut income taxes, as a way to stimulate the economy, create more jobs, raise the standard of living.  I doubt Kennedy was right-wing.)

(d) Chileans have a choice to invest in their pension plans, and their pension plans are 141 times sounder that the German pension system (or 23 times more than American system). Instead of government run investment system (Social Security gives you 1-2% return - hahaha -funny and sad), they use a private-investment run system (so much better).

(e) Chile has free trade with a few countries, esp. with the USA.  That rises the standard of living of the Chileans, esp. the poor.  Chile is in top 10-20 economically developed and/or economically competitive and/or economically free nations.

(f) Chile is # 11 in the economic Freedom Index.  Germany is # 18.  France is # 44

(g) You somehow blamed Gen. Pinochet. China also follows some libertarian principles.  Should we blame China or the Communist authoritarian bloody regime for doing that?

5.  Again, you try to divide political spectrum into a 2-dimension - Left and right.
(a) There are no libertarian parties in Europe, so your analysis is not sound.
(b)  The libertarian party calls for legalization of
(i)  drugs
(ii) prostitution
(iii) homosexual marriage (overall, because there is a dispute about that in the party though and its also an obscure issue, when the state's rights are diminished)
(iv) open borders and more immigraton (yet you talk about xenophobia)

--- The rationale is that the state should not be involved in such matters, but rather the adult and consenting individuals should make these decisions.

None of these positions are right or far right or extreme right or right of the center or right-of-Venus or right-of-Mars.
(c) There is one libertarian in the US Cogress, Ron Paul, who is also a Republican
(d) There is a Libertarian Caucus in the Rep. Party and the Dem. Party.

6.  CLARITY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN AGREEMENT.

You think the best way to provide jobs, to increase the standard of living, to stimulate the economy is through the state and the bureaucrats.  *There are millions of people who think like you).  I think, the free market and the individuals are better at it.  That's it.