Display:
You are repeating an argument peddled by the nuclear lobby that is totally against the facts, since it is based on a blatantly out-of-context sampling of energy statistics.

In 2003 for example, imports from France totalled 20.2 TWh, that's just 3.3% of the total German production. However, according to VDEW, most of that transited Germany to third countries (the Netherlands and Italy), and wasn't destined for German consumers.

Furthermore, even that part which went for Germany means little of Germany's total export/import balance isn't considered. That balance is positive! In 2003, a total of 53.7 TWh was exported, and 45.7 TWh imported; in 2004, it was 51.5 TWh exports vs 44.2 Twh imports.

Finally, just as nuclear energy can be transited, so can renewable energy. Transfers between countries are one of the possible solutions to reduce the impact of wind(/sun/wave) intermittance.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Sep 23rd, 2005 at 07:34:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BTW, Denmark's total electricity export/import balance (not just that with Germany) is positive too - even tough they have a much higher ratio of wind and zero nuclear.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Sep 23rd, 2005 at 07:36:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series