I would not be surprised that many Romanians still have mistaken notions about minorities: under the old regime there was NO unbiased official information, there was no official effort to raise the awareness of ethnic Romanians (from homogeneous areas), to make them acquainted with the culture and history of these groups. On the contrary, all an average Romanian would hear about minorities would be that they are abusive guests, parasites, you name it. Things have been VERY SLOWLY improving since 1989, but it will take a long time until Romanians come to fully accept the fact that R. is a multicultural, multilingual society. In this process, the differences between R's regions are bound to become deeper. On my sporadic visits Transylvania does seem to be proudly multicultural, with many Romanians voluntarily learning the once-derided Hungarian language, but I am a bit sceptic (and uninformed) about the other regions.
P.s. For the record, I'm an ethnic Hungarian who grew up in Transylvania. Some stuff I wrote about Ceausescu's propaganda may sound harsh and biased, but unfortunately those texts and manifests WERE pretty awful. One good thing was that many people were just deaf to all this, out of a healthy E-European distrust for officialdom. A dog's a dog. A Cat's a Cat. (T.S. Eliot)
Not directly on topic but a fun read is her excursion into what she calls 'political necrophilia' The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change