Display:
The word "exile" is too generous a term and technically incorrect. Craxi was a fugitive from justice, a criminal at large, definitively condemned in absentia for corruption and fraud. His well-publicized appeals to the European court of justice were rejected.

As for Craxi's political heritage, he destroyed a great and venerable party, the Socialist party, and spent most of his career adlibbing statesmanship and closet bickering with De Mita and Andreotti. He had the physique du role yet left nothing good of relevance.

Berlusconi was his principal brother-in-arms, a major source of slush funds. It is thanks to Craxi's tailor made laws that Berlusconi acquired and enforced his media monopoly.


by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 07:27:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"Craxi died in exile" was a rhetorical way to highlight the ultimate failure of mani pulite. I did not know that Berlusconi had ties with Craxi, but I am not surprised. The interesting thing is how he has been able to turn public opinion against the judiciary.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 07:37:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You are right, it would be interesting to document B's all out war on the judiciary and how he managed to turn the tide in public opinion from a nearly unanimous approval rating during mani puliti to a certain disenchantment, fortunately not majoritarian. Berlusconi's monopoly of prime time and lunch time television is largely responsible. For years Vittorio Sgarbi screamed insults and calumny on judges at lunch time. B has a state-of-the-arts spin-and-smear machine that is comparatively far more powerful than anything Rove could dream of.
by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 08:07:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Wikipedia: Statutory Term Strategy [against] Mani Pulite
After Berlusconi's victory in 2001, the gradual campaign against judges reached the point where it is not only openly acceptable to criticize judges for having carried out Mani pulite, but it has become increasingly difficult to broadcast opinions favorable to Milan's pool. This is an impressive 180° cultural turn from 1992, when no politician was believed and no judge was contested, in which the Berlusconi's power in media has undoubtedly played an important role. Even Umberto Bossi, whose Lega Nord once made a statement bringing and showing a hanging rope in a parliamentary session, has become highly critical of judges, even though there are still occasional frictions between Lega Nord and former Christian Democrat or Socialist allies in Berlusconi's coalition.
You say "a certain disenchantment, fortunately not majoritarian". How bad is it, really?

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 08:11:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think that B's rightwing coalition has a hard time keeping the lid on their anti-judiciary spin. The so-called "girotondo" movement of the past few years demonstrated that large sectors of the population defend and approve of the judiciary. The justice and legality movements do get their message across despite negative media coverage and news blackouts on their activity. There was a
poll
conducted in 2004 which shows that opinions about the judiciary are not as B's propaganda would have it.

There are two "souls" to the judiciary problem. It is a social norm to distrust justice in Italy by large sectors of the population. This dates back decades. The Italian judiciary system has historically been slow and Byzantine, often condemned by the Hague and Human Rights organizations such as Amnesty International. It's however important to note that the fault lies primarily at the feet of parliament and politicians who are ultimately responsible for judiciary reform and law. Judges apply laws and legal norms, they don't make them. Yet they take the flack unjustly.

Berlusconi's strategy was to graft his personal problems, as well as those of his referents, onto pre-existing discontent. In a way it's a mimicry tactic that worked for a while.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 09:37:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I wouldn't call the Italian Socialist Party "great and venerable", nor credit Craxi with its destruction.

The PSI was a willing participant in yay-45 years of a corrupt system designed to keep the largest party by number of militants and votes, the Communist Party, from sharing in the national government.

The Italian Communists' saintly patience was rewarded when they became the only major party to survive Mani Pulite, and its descendant parties now make the bulk of the left, the old Socialists having joined ranks with the Christian Democrats behind Berlusconi.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 10:44:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
When I refer to the Italian Socialist Party as "great and venerable" I have in mind Pietro Nenni and Sandro Pertini, the years of persecution during fascism, the PSI's contribution to the birth of the Republic.

The PSI was occasionally a party in coalition governments until 1981, but not as often as the splinter party, PSDI. In the 80's with the advent of Craxi and the craxi boys government coalitions were formed around the axis of the conservative DC factions in alliance with the socialists. This period was characterized by massive corruption and diffused illegality at all levels of government, collusion with subversive Masonic lodges and organized criminality. Despite Craxi's charisma the PSI remained stable throughout the decade with an average membership of approximately 600.000. With the demise of the PSDI in 1989 for corruption, PSI membership rose slightly without absorbing entirely the PSDI orphans. After Craxi's whining "Tommy did it, too" speech in 1991, the PSI collapsed to no more than 50.000 members and has never recovered.

The vestiges of the party are divided between the two major coalitions. Both coalitions trip over each other in their praise of Craxi as some sort of statesman. The left, by doing so, may make a few craxi boys and girls gaga with glee but render a disservice to the PSI and law-abiding citizens.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Fri Jan 13th, 2006 at 05:24:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd say keeping the Communists out of power would be a positive accomplishment. Yes, they weren't corrupt, but that is not the only standard by which to judge a political party. As the diary points out, the CDU led Italy of the postwar period was a deeply corrupt entity with close ties to the Mafia. A hell of a lot to criticize, but I fail to see how the creation of a People's Republic of Italy would have been an improvement.

Yes, I know that Togliatti paid lip service to democracy after 1944, I don't believe it. He made it alive through the thirties living in Moscow, no senior Communist from a non-democratic country did that without being an absolutely loyal Stalinist (and a dose of luck as well).  His periods outside the USSR were as head of Comintern operations in Spain. That was a pretty ruthless organization.  He also spent some time as the person responsible for Comintern's Eastern Europe operations when Stalin, working through the Conintern, decided that entire Polish Communist Party was a Trotskyist/fascist organization and proceeded to have every single senior activist killed.

by MarekNYC on Sat Jan 14th, 2006 at 04:36:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good points, but then again, I see Togliatti's disarmament of the partizans as much more than lip service, and later, Berlinguer's 'rebellion' on the issue of Prague was significant too.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Jan 14th, 2006 at 07:10:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You could see the disarmament of the partisans as a pragmatic measure by someone who understood that he would have no chance of winning a civil war in a country where a majority was non-communist and which had a large American troop presence.  The PCI of the seventies and eighties was not that of the initial postwar period; Berlinguer was not Togliatti. I would have found the prospect of them winning power worrying, but not terrifying. Call it the difference between a straightforward fascist party led by a former senior fascist official winning power, and a reformed one which retained a fascist minority and was led by someone who had been a fascist supporter but since then clearly denounced fascism - e.g. like today's Fini.
by MarekNYC on Sun Jan 15th, 2006 at 11:22:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
By that same logic, the Greek Civil War after WWII was a positive accomplishment... As was keeping Franco and Salazar in power until the 1970's... Or murdering Allende...

Marek, tell me again how Franco was better than Jaruzelski?

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 15th, 2006 at 04:26:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are you seriously trying to say that postwar Italy was the equivalent of Franco's Spain or Pinochet's Chile? Are you saying that Allende was a Stalinist directly complicit in mass murder?
by MarekNYC on Sun Jan 15th, 2006 at 11:10:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, I'm saying that anti-communism is a feeble excuse.
I'd say keeping the Communists out of power would be a positive accomplishment.


guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 15th, 2006 at 01:16:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Italian Communist Party owes its singularity to the political brilliance of Togliatti and the visionary genius of Gramsci. Precisely because Gramsci foresaw the horrors of the proletarian dictatorship in the hands of an elite as early as 1926, he was isolated within his own party. After the war, his party adversary, Togliatti, was brilliant enough to recuperate Gramsci and adapt his message to the emerging republic.

The PCI was traumatised by the 1956 Hungarian invasion. The Socialist party broke up the alliance, and many intellectuals abandoned the party in protest. The gradual evolution of the PCI from an openly anti-Atlantic position to a pro-Europe stance of constructive criticism of the two blocks led to the radical break with the Comintern over the Prague Spring in 1969. The PCI actively encouraged Dubcek with Longo in Prague as early as May 5th, and denounced the invasion in no uncertain terms (Luigi Longo, not Berlinguer, was secretary at the time).

The sharing of national political power came after the years of international tension and civil unrest (call it low intensity war, if you will) that characterized the seventies. Moro had attempted an historical compromise with the PCI which was decisively sabotaged by Washington. Throughout the national emergency, there was a de facto collaboration between the two major parties, the DC and the PCI which became de jure when the PCI voted the Andreotti government and its program in 1976. Although there were no communists in the executive, the PCI's role in parliament as allies was crucial throughout the national emergency. The Andreotti government fell in 1979 when the communist withdrew their support. The PCI was punished in the ensuing elections, which opened the way for the DC-PSI eighties.  

The PCI was the first communist party to condemn the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, as well as the coup d'état in Poland in 1981. The first official comment by the Russians on that occasion was an attack on the PCI. Not surprisingly neither the Russians nor the Americans wanted the PCI in power throughout the cold war, and it was only until Clinton gave the green light did the Americans start, timidly, to refrain from meddling in Italian internal politics.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Sun Jan 15th, 2006 at 01:12:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series