Display:
This has nothing to do with the Orange Revolution - or only in so far as the changes amongst the Ukrainians have disturbed the cozy arrangements between the Russian oligarchs and the Ukrainian oligarchs.

Ukraine gets 60 bcm per year from Russia - forget the cosy illusion that more than that comes form Turkmenistan, it's really Russian gas. Ukrainians PAY FOR THAT GAS, partly in transit fee offstes, partly in cash - but Gazprom and the Russian State get nothing of this money because it is kept by a few well place individuals who HAVE to be very near the top of Gazprom and the Kremlin. This is money paid by the Ukrainians and stolen from the Russian population by a combination of Russian, Central Asian and Ukrainian criminals.

Should Yushenko succeed in cleaning up Ukrainian gas market practises, the Russian population (or at least Gazprom, an imperfect proxy) would at least benefit a little bit.

Let me say this again - the Ukrainian gas trade is theft by bandits from Russia, not by Ukrainians from Russia.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:14:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What Gazprom suggests is buying directly from Gazprom, but Yushenko keeps talking about imaginary under market prices, so looks like he is covering up the theft.
by blackhawk on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:30:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It would be good for Gazprom and for Russia (and probably also for Ukraine) that there be direct buying, but not for Gazprom managers with their hands in the pie, thus it is not happening

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:40:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Wha? That is exactly what Gazprom suggests.
by blackhawk on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:43:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
.
Russia CANNOT afford to cut off gas and be seen by Europe as an unreliable partner in the energy sphere, the only one where it is a serious player.

BTW 75% of Gazprom's profits originate in Western Europe.

Today's diary faces reality of Gazprom (Kremlin) having cut gas supply to Ukraine for failure to meet a new agreement per year's end.  Ukraine as poor man has not been able to pay its bills for gas it got serviced. I personally would cut supplies too when I don't get paid for delivery. I am sure it's mostly politics, complicated by the upcoming Ukrainian parliamentary election in March 2006.

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY

by Oui on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 02:35:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course I read what you wrote.  I was not merely responding to this particular diary, but to the innumerable other diaries you have posted all over the internet.

All of a sudden you are an expert on the internal workings of Gazprom.  My uncle was Deputy Minister of Economics during Soviet times and is now a high-level executive at Gazprom and even he admits that he doesn't know what exactly is going on.  Yet Jerome a Paris has proven beyond a doubt that my uncle is a thief who is stealing gas money from the Russian people...  This is why I don't post.

You are very much mistaken if you think Yushenko is cleaning up anything.  He is just trying to get his piece of the pie.  His nationalism will backfire on him, though, when the Ukrainian people realize that he has done nothing but lower their standard of living and sour relations with their neighbor.  Not just a neighbor, however, most people in the east of Ukraine identify more with Russia than with their own country - they speak Russian, their children go to Russian language schools, they watch TV in Russian, etc.

by skitalets on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:31:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll be happy to concede that it is very much possible that Yushenko is simply trying to get a piece of the pie. I don't know either way.

As to Gazprom, I did work very closely with several board members for an extended bit of time a few years ago and I know a few things. There are lots of honest, hard working people at Gazprom - I have also written repeatedly that Gazprom is industrially well run and is the backbone of Russia - and that the company held the country together during the 90s, but are you seriously going to tell me that there are no crooks at Gazprom (and the Kremlin), and especially near the top?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:44:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Gazprom is BIG organization, so definately, there are few bad apples here and there.

But in this case billions are being stolen by the Ukrainian side and what Gazprom proposes will stop this.

by blackhawk on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:48:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ukraine gets 25 bcm/y for "free" (i.e. in a trade for the use of vital infrastructure); they cost Gazprom $100 million to produce.

Ukrainians pay a real price on 35 bcm/y of gas sold by mysterious intermediary companies that get full access to Gazprom's "magistrals" (at no cost) - but Gazprom sees not one cent of that money. Who is stealing THAT money? That's what at stake today.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 10:54:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
At stake are 7 bcm/y stolen by Ukraine.

Ukrainians pay discount price (1/4th of real) to effectively Ukranian company. Gazprom does get transit fee, although from what I gather at 2/3 of the fee Ukraine charges.

Current Gazprom proposals eliminate this business.

by blackhawk on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 11:26:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I do recall that Nash Dom-Rossiya (Our Home is Russia) the Rightwing Political Party that held power for some years in Russia was known to its opponents as 'Nash Dom-Gazprom'.  
by saugatojas on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 05:08:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I just wonder if we have met before? Do you live in New Zealand by any chance, or lived there some time ago? If this is the case, you can reply on my email address right below my comment.

I apologize to other readers, but I didn't find skitalets' contact info.

by aquilon (albaruthenia at gmail dot com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 02:20:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
.
There should not be a divide between people across borders of Europe and other continents.

It's difficult to keep in touch with the developments in Russian society, economy and daily life. News items usually don't go beyond a few headlines, with articles written by journalists with Western bias even if they are not on a White House or DoD payroll.

The so-called Orange Revolt in the Ukraine has remained a mystery to me what really happened. USAID and Western NGOs taking part in the election campaign would not be tolerated in reciprocal manner in any U.S. Presidential or Congressional election!

Please keep writing your view, likely easier here at EuroTrib or BooMan's Place, rather that fast track @dKos.

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY

by Oui on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 03:41:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I am sorry to interfere, but I have a few questions :
When I do not agree, I try to understand and argue, not shy away from the debate for months and then claim the right to have my opinions supported aginst those of somone who has long proved he has a first class insight into the subject ;
Besides, I find it really hard to believe one can just read through during months and not feel eager to join the on-going debates.
It seems you and I have very little in common...
To put it short, I am very eager now to use my trusted user's prerogative, but Sven put it better than me, so I will leave it as it is.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 04:02:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I find it really hard to believe one can just read through during months and not feel eager to join the on-going debates.
I'm sorry, Agnes, but lurking is a very common phenomenon on the Internet, and should be respected. When a lurker exposes him/herself, they should generally be encouraged to express themselves more fully, and should not have their motives questioned. If I remember correctly, you yourself came to ET by invitation of a powerful personality within ET, but most others are likely to have been lurking for a while.

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 04:12:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank you, Migeru!

I'm not sure I want to "expose myself" in public anymore ;-)

As I said, I usually agreen with Jerome.  In this case of the Russia - Ukraine gas situation, however, I think he is too far away to be able to analyse Russia's motives.  I don't even know if he speaks Russian.  If not, he is getting a very media-biased version -- even worse than his pet case of French bias in British media!

by skitalets on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 04:25:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You may not have followed the link to Ukraine vs Russia: Tales of pipelines and dependence, where Jerome implies that he does at least read Russian and that he has inside knowledge of the way Gazprom operated in 1994:
One reason I have been writing with such bluntness on the Russian-Ukrainian spat is that I was on the ground when this crisis was resolved for the first time, in 1994. I spent 6 months in the Kiev office of GDF (Gaz de France) that year. This was the way I had found to be on the ground as I wrote my PhD dissertation on "the independence of Ukraine", and it turned out to be amazingly useful as the gas negotiations were at the core of what made that independence possible. So I spent a lot of time tracking press reports in the Ukrainian, Russian and international press to try to make sense of all the announcements that were made

Now, I would really be curious to know, for instance, what your perspective as a Russian is of, say, Putin's direct role (or lack thereof) in this crisis or where the political relationships among Russia, Belarus and Ukraine are going. Maybe if you write a couple of diaries you'll reveal your area of expertise and people won't think you're just "some Russian".

Then again, contributions shouldn't be measured on their authors' credentials, but on their own merit.

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 04:40:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
that I made a mistake when I published this diary with the wrong link to my earlier post on the topic, where I presented my credentials.

I do speak Russian, I did spend 6 months in Kiev in 1994 working specifically on Russian-Ukrainian relations, and several years (1997-2001) when Gazprom was my main client and I managed the relationship of my bank with them at various levels, including board level.

I am happy to be proven wrong, in that today's situation is really different from that in the past few years when the stakes were exactly the same, but I a mskeptical and you'll have to provide tangible arguments.

I am sorry if I was a bit aggressive in my responses to you, but your accusation that I was anti-Russian missed my point, which is not a criticism of Russia, but an attempt to analyse the motivations of individuals in position of power in Russia and Ukraine and how they use their access to levers of power for what are not necessarily the interests of their country.

I am glad that you posted and questioned me, and I hope that you will continue to do so despite the rough welcome I gave you!

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 05:12:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I really think we should see a diary from him about re-selling 7 billion cubic meters at $250, possibly with sources. I think you dismiss him on that all too off-hand, these numbers seem to originate somewhere, possibly Gazprom claims - so this is something even you could do as a Russian-speaker, could you look into Gazprom's claims?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 05:19:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
i very doubt whether Jerome speaks Russian at all

And what's wrong with lurking??? S'pose loads of Russians may well read these pages without any desire to join in. D'ya know why? If the core community (Jerome, that Polish lass, Migeru and a couple of others) aren't bitching about Russians, they're bitching about USA. That is European Unoin all about, innit? Sad, actually...

by lana on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 08:25:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Next thing you know we'll be bitching about the French, the British and the Austrians. Or the Spanish. If national partisans from everywhere complani that we're being mean to them are we doing our job right?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 08:35:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, i wouldn't be surprised if you're bitching about the British, Colman (are you that man who always calls that froggy Jerome "our leader"?)
I just meant this site has its clique as many others have and that this clique is a) anti-american and b) anti-russian in a rather funny way - you use English language to bitch about the USA and use Russian gas and oil to bitch about Russia.

So... why not be a little more consistent in your hatred (fuelled by your greed and your jealousy and some unlucky events from the past)?

Why not choose another language which everybody in Europe may use, say German (ha!), Polish (ha-bloody-ha!) or even French (burst of laughter)? Why not stop using our natural resources like, say, Americans managed to ignore the Olimpic Games in 1980 in Moscow?

My questions are rhetorical but if the bulk of Europeans have the same views as Jerome at al... hmm... i don't think the European Union has a very bright future, you can't build anything which will work reliably on the unstable full-of-hatred full-of-enemies ground. The Soviet Union's past has already proved this.

by lana on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 12:47:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
(are you that man who always calls that froggy Jerome "our leader"?)

How about you show a little respect, or else, f**k off yourself?

The world's northernmost desert wind.

by Sirocco (sirocco2005ATgmail.com) on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 01:11:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was just ignoring this nonsense - no point feeding the troll.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 01:13:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I wasn't aware that anyone here has been anti-Russian. I speak some Russian, have a Russian/Latvian grandmother, but I'm French. This means that on a daily basis I love my French culture, I love criticizing France, and I love singing Na Sopkakh Manchurii real loud, like that guy does in the movie Urga. In fact I'd say that Russia is a country that fascinates me.
by Alex in Toulouse on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 01:44:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Привет, Лана!

I am beginning to lose all respect for Jerome based on this comment on DailyKos:

"As to who can tolerate this situation longer than the other, i would not bet on Russia myself. They are much weaker than they like to pretend. it's only bluster and our own cowardice that lets them get away with so much. If the game becomes hardball/war, they will stop very quickly: because Europe can do the old African routine: deny access to Paris and London to the girlfriends of all the Russian big bosses, and you'll see how long they last..."

Jerome made this ridiculous post in this diary.

I would like you to know, Jerome, that now when we go to Paris and London, we are suprised that they are not up to the level of Moscow.  I am not joking.  You have not been there since 2001, no?  You should go and see what I mean.

by skitalets on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 07:38:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Privyet Skitalyets,

I am beginning to lose all respect for Jerome based on this comment on DailyKos

I think that's because you may be reading it from a Nationalistic point of view, when it should be read from a Political/Realpolitik(al) point of view, no? Jérôme isn't targetting Russia, he's targetting one action by the Russian government concerning one industry sector.

It's like the difference between saying France is shit and Chirac is shit, or Americans suck and America sucks.

If you say France is shit, I might get offended if I think you're talking about the inhabitants (but I doubt it, I have some experience in that field which I mention elsewhere in this thread). If you say Chirac is shit, I'll agree!! Now if you talk about France in some geo-political context, I know you won't be talking about the people ... and so I will then either agree or disagree, depending on the context.

It does seem pretty clear that when Jérôme says Russia, he means the government, and he means it only in this particular context. His comment on the old African routine and girlfriends, I read to be about cultural isolation, not about the types of goods found in luxury shops nor about how clean the sidewalks are. i.e. this is regardless of how slick and modern Moscow sidewalks are, and how much dog shit there is on Paris sidewalks.

Now let me reach for my guitar and sing one of my favourite songs ...

Plachyet maladyena jeeeeeeena, plachyet vsyo, kak adin chelyavek ... plink plonk tsoinggg

by Alex in Toulouse on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 08:14:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
By the way, my expression => "cultural isolation" is not about Culture. I'd never say such a thing about Culture! (ie. Moscow is a cultural hotspot, the opera is awesome, the movie industry is good, theatre is on etc etc). My expression is about access to other cultures, as in other countries. Political isolation if you prefer.
by Alex in Toulouse on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 08:20:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the involved parties having agreed that we all got carried away. So I will not respond to your post. Have just one genuine question though as your English sounds better than mine : what does "lass" mean ?

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 08:59:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
according to my Scottish mates lass means girl for those British folk living ooop north
by lana on Tue Jan 3rd, 2006 at 12:13:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's something very odd about someone from Russia using words like "lass" and "mates," and Deep-South terms (terms?  quasi-words?) like "innit".  My cousin from Georgia says "innit".  People from St. Petersburg don't (unless they're from St. Petersburg, Florida).

If it's all about bashing America -- or so you think -- then perhaps I might point out that I'm an American, as are (I believe) DowneastDem, slaboymni, Robert (rdf), and Chris.  Migeru earned his PhD from the University of California, if I'm not mistaken.  Jerome is a big name at Daily Kos (the largest American political blog on the web).  Where is the anti-Americanism?  I'd like to think that, as an American who loves what his country is supposed to stand for, I can decide for myself what anti-Americanism looks like, thank you.

And who is "that Polish lass"?

And am I the only one who thought Jerome's comment, about London and Paris being off-limits to the girlfriends of Russian big bosses, was incredibly funny?  So this is what Rifkin meant by "waging peace" in The European Dream.

I'm not going to jump into a fight over London, Paris and Moscow, except to say that, if you want to get into a debate on which cities are on a higher level than others, you may want to avoid bringing up Moscow, where the murder rate is three times that of London.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Jan 4th, 2006 at 12:40:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
May "the Polish lass" point out that she has a US Green Card? So much for the anti-americanism. I have pledged no longer to respond to subversive threads, anb slaboymni's joining is great timing.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Wed Jan 4th, 2006 at 01:38:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suggest we all chill off. Am not questioning lurking, yet silence can me easily misinterpreted, as I just did. However the human voice is the only sound that can be heard over gunfires, even when it's a whisper.
 

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Mon Jan 2nd, 2006 at 04:37:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
43 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
28 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
28 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
43 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series