Display:
I don't know what the totals come to, but I'd guess we're looking at perhaps a few thousand deaths worlwide over the last decade.

That's an excellent safety record. It's better than the airline industry can manage.

I know for sure that trains in the UK are now extremely safe. The last few high profile accidents have all been caused by motorists. Otherwise fatalities average to something like 10-20 per year. And that's mostly because of a handful of very big accidents a few years ago.

For comparison, car fatalities in the UK run at more than 3,000 per year. I don't know what the figure worlwide is, but it's certainly going to be a non-trivial number.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 02:06:43 PM EST
In 2004, 9'309 train accidents did occur in EU-25, with 1'483 fatalities (collision, derailment, level-crossing, rolling stock in motion), but only 84 were passengers. Collisions and derailments are counting for 39 cases. (Eurostat, 2006 full report)
by Hansvon on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 05:01:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure where they got 96 for the number of UK fatalities, but that doesn't seem to be accurate. See:

http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2004/e04132.htm
http://www.hse.gov.uk/PRESS/2005/e05098.htm

for the official UK figures.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 09:30:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the solution is in the fine print, in the Annex of the press report about the 2003/4 report: the topline figures excluded trespassers and suicides.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Oct 18th, 2006 at 10:50:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series