Display:
Jimmy Carter staked his presidency on that notion.  He walked to his inauguration rather than riding in a limosine.  He turned down thermostats and put on sweaters.  He installed solar panels on the White House.  He was one of our truly great American presidents, and one of the most underestimated.  He was right about energy thirty years before anyone else.  And for his sins we replaced him after a single term with a smooth talking demagogue who had parlayed a mediocre film career into a pretty good gig playing a governor in California.

We all watch with growing concern the global calamity that is the George W Bush presidency, but almost everything that concerns us about him began with Reagan.  We all ponder with varying degrees of sadness and anger the current reality compared to what might have been if Al Gore had taken office in 2001.  Imagine how very different the world might be now if Jimmy Carter had served a second term.  The alternate reality with respect to energy policy alone is enough to boggle the mind.


Now where are we going and what's with the handbasket?

by budr on Tue Oct 31st, 2006 at 12:57:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Reagan message was the exact opposite of Carter's--enjoy life, spend, flaunt your wealth, buy big cars, don't pay taxes because they just go to people with welfare Cadillacs.

Carter bummed everyone out.  He didn't offer fun and opulence.  I think that's why Gore has been so careful in the way he's shaped his message in An Inconvenient Truth and his speeches about global warming.

People want to be entertained and coaxed into feeling good by politicians. Reagan was a genius at that.  Never mind that there was no substance.

by Plan9 on Tue Oct 31st, 2006 at 01:14:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
basically, it's a perfect example of the primary downside of popularly elected officials.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Oct 31st, 2006 at 04:33:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series