European Tribune

Display:
Scotsman: EU to call for more labour-law flexibility

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union should modernise labour laws to meet the economy's need of greater flexibility, but also seek to maximise worker protection, the European Commission will say this week.

In a report on what the EU should do to boost jobs and achieve sustainable growth, the EU executive advocates a combination of flexibility and security, or "flexicurity," to help the European labour market take on the double challenge of fierce Asian competition and an ageing society.

"Rapid technological progress, increased competition stemming from globalisation, changing consumer demand and significant growth of the services sector have shown the need for increased flexibility," the report, to be adopted by the Commission on Wednesday, said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Nov 20th, 2006 at 12:05:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Strange how these reports seem to be balanced in the details (flexibility AND more security) and yet the press releases and the press articles only seem to focus on one side of it.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Mon Nov 20th, 2006 at 04:03:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't agree with the view which states that flexibility and security are mutually exclusive.  This article, while at least superficially agreeing with me, simply sounds like pandering, though.  It's a common problem in small-"d" democratic politics: "Let's not and say we did" -- that is, put forth a policy that allegedly meets both objectives when, in reality, it accomplishes nothing and makes the situation even worse.  You can have a flexible labor market without allowing the losers' lives to fall apart, but to pretend as though it doesn't require very difficult and, in many (if not most) cases, unpopular choices is foolish.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Mon Nov 20th, 2006 at 04:26:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh I agree that both are compatible. It's just that we only see the implementatation of the one, and not of the other.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Mon Nov 20th, 2006 at 06:18:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
17 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
32 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
10 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
8 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series