European Tribune

Display:
  1. Aoun
  2. Hezbollah
  3. a smaller extremist group bent on stirring trouble and then take the stage in their own community
  4. Israel
...

It is an even more murkier world than Italian secret services.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 04:17:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One conspiracy theory making the rounds is... hmmm, who wants the Lebanese government to fall?  

Because if one-third of the 24 cabinet ministers quit (or, apparently, die) then it automatically brings down the government.  Six have already walked out, plus one dead... and now the sketchy stories about some kind of shooting at Michel Pharon's office... so now many people are asking who would benefit from this?

Ya Libnan: Coup d'etat underway in Lebanon?

Beirut - The assassination of Pierre Gemayel means that two more ministers need to resign or be killed in order to bring down the anti-Syrian government.

As if one assassination were not enough bloodshed for one day, the murderers proceeded to target another anti-Syrian Member of Parliament - Michel Pharaon.

Syria's allies in Lebanon are planning to take the streets on Thursday to demand the government resign. The pro-Syrian allies in Lebanon include Hezbollah, Michel Aoun's political party and Nabih Berri's Amal movement.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 05:47:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for the link -Ya Libnan seems to be the only English-language site on the web mentioning the almost-simultaneous attack against the office of Michel Pharaon.

While I was on their site I came across this - note the date:


Geagea predicts assassinations of Lebanon ministers
Saturday, 18 November, 2006 @ 9:45 AM

Beirut - Samir Geagea an anti-Syrian Christian leader said on Friday efforts to topple Lebanon's Western-backed government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora could lead to assassination attempts against cabinet ministers.
(...)
Geagea told Reuters that the government now has 17 ministers, if 3 of these ministers were eliminated then the government will automatically fall.
(...)
He would not say who might try to kill ministers, but said Syria has some minor allies in Lebanon who may attempt the assassinations to prevent the international court from taking place.

I had the impression everyone else was worried mainly about the promised mass demos, thought street-fighting or shootouts might break out.. first I'd heard about expectations of ministers being assassinated! Also striking how so far the action (prediction + attacks) all seems to be inside the contentious little world of Lebanon's Christian parties.

Jumping onto a completely different hypothesis-track: I've read somewhere that in the Palestinian camps in Lebanon there are some Salafist factions that are both fiercely anti-Lebanese-Christian (...bad bad memories...) and strongly anti-Shi'ite for sectarian reasons.. some of which are tending towards AQ if not actually allied with it? AQ is another "player" that would just LOVE the havoc of civil war in Lebanon - as would Israel.    


"Ignoring moralities is always undesirable, but doing so systematically is really worrisome." Mohammed Khatami

by eternalcityblues (parvati_roma aaaat libero.it) on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 08:10:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Check out this AP Story from November 13th.

An interesting snippet:

The Al-Hayat newspaper reported that al-Qaida issued the statement from the Palestinian refugee camp of Nahr el-Bared in northern Lebanon.

"The organization has arrived in Lebanon and we will work on destroying this corrupt government that receives orders from the American administration," Al-Hayat said, quoting the statement.

Although it was impossible to verify the authenticity of the message, Information Minister Ghazi Aridi cast doubt on its veracity Monday.

It's just possible that AQ guys among the Palestinians north of Beirut did carry out the job.  

by Hoya90 (hoya90jmk-at-yahoo-dot-com) on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 08:43:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Also possible: some local group taking al-Qaida's mantle.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 03:31:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Or any one of a hundred plots straight out of a spy novel ... Israel trying to link the conflict in the region more closely to the  War of Terror, for instance.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 03:35:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As I said, an even more murkier world than Italian secret services. (AFAIK we still don't know exactly who organised and executed the embassy and US GI barracks suicide bombings in the early eighties.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 03:37:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
AQ is in Lebanon, and, I'm told, not just in the Palestinian camps (most of which are fairly heavily guarded, to the point that they're virtual prisons).  They have been keeping a low profile, but they're there.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:14:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That said, I don't think it's in their interest to topple the current government.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:15:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry for asking, but according to whom (or at least how reliable is the source - street rumour or reliable intelligence?), and what precisely do they mean by AQ?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:17:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's hard to say what AQ is anywhere... but these are militant Salafis who in some but not all cases will self-identify as AQ, which even so may mean nothing more than an ideological affinity for the network rather than organizational or operational ties.

In the camps, they are relatively open, and I know several people who have actually met them there.  In other parts of the country, friends who live in Lebanon tell me they're a known presence, but much more secretive.  In both cases, a significant number of them have returned to Lebanon from Iraq.  But we are also not talking about hundreds or thousands of people, from what I understand.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:42:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There is even a Bin-Laden-praising Sunni party in Parliament, but strangely enough, it is part of the March 14th coalition.

BTW, maybe US intel would be worth something if it recruited you...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:57:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
AAAAAHH!  Bite your tongue!

Actually, I don't know whether to be insulted or relieved that they've never tried.  I know a couple of people they have approached.  But their language skills are better than mine....

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 06:09:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Also, I understand your curiosity as to the sourcing, so for a little independent verification ... this excellent story has much of the same information.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:48:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Can I take this opportunity to say, yet again, "Told you so you stupid fucking muscular liberal wankers". Not that there are any reading here. All straight out of "How to create global holy war for dummies", coming soon.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 06:06:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
since i agree that this assassination can come from Christian side, it is very unlikely than Aoun is invloved, he had thousands previous opportunity/reason to remove Gemayel the last 30 years and i do not believe that this attack will strengthen his position.

BTW Gemayel was not an angel, i have not tears for him

by fredouil (fredouil@gmailgmailgmail.com) on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 07:34:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I can't see what Aoun would stand to gain either - his position's already strong, he was looking towards elections not mayhem. In fact given the huge bitterness amongst Phalangist-etc. supporters about his alliance with Nasrallah (Lebanese comments-sites full of insults for months!), I'd have thought he was more likely to be assassinated than Gemayel.

Ah well, I clearly lack GeaGea's uncanny premonitory gifts.

"Ignoring moralities is always undesirable, but doing so systematically is really worrisome." Mohammed Khatami

by eternalcityblues (parvati_roma aaaat libero.it) on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 08:18:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Aoun is a much harder target.  He lives in a fortress on top of a mountain outside of Beirut, and rarely leaves.

Also, depending on who's doing the killing, Aoun wouldn't necessarily be a target.  He is Hezbollah's key Christian ally, and we certainly can't rule out that they did this.  All this speculation is just that -- speculation.  Nobody knows a damn thing, and the different groups in Lebanon will believe what they want  to believe, probably regardless of what the evidence says.

Everyone thinks everyone is a target in Lebanon.  People have been predicting the imminent assassination of Walid Jumblatt for years.  (One of my friends, who was about 10 blocks away when the bomb killed Hariri, said that every single person in the room with him looked up when they heard the sound and said, "Hmmm, wonder if they finally got Jumblatt?")  And yet he still moves around with relative ease.  (I unexpectedly ended up four feet away from him last year as he arrived on foot at the big rally on the one-year anniversary of the Hariri assassination.)

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:24:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I've got a link downthread to a story where AQ told the Al-Hayat newspaper that they would topple the Lebanese government.

Since Hizbollah managed to survive its war with Israel, AQ has been playing catch up in trying to prove that it will be the ultimate defender of Islam.  They don't like playing second fiddle to a bunch of Shi'a heretics.

It wouldn't surprise me that they would try to do a trifecta of assassinations in Lebanon to topple the government and prove that they can play power broker.  Even though the action would bring Hizbollah to power, it would be at their hand and not the direct action of Nasrallah and company.

It also begs the question of Syrian complicity.  Syria was fairly willing to let foreign jihadists make their way into Iraq the last few years.  This situation would also serve their interests - topple the current government without getting their fingerprints on the dirty work.

by Hoya90 (hoya90jmk-at-yahoo-dot-com) on Tue Nov 21st, 2006 at 09:53:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Syria was fairly willing to let foreign jihadists make their way into Iraq the last few years.

Methinks that's 99% US propaganda, and rather lousy for that. If the US failed to control borders with all their night-vision, satellite and aerial equipment, how come the Syrians were supposed to do better.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 03:35:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Plus the only border guards anyone reports seeing on the border are Syrian. Hey maybe the Iraqis or our US forces may want to do something about securing a border instead of making ludicrous claims that the Syrian leadership would actively encourage Sunni extremists. However, there is a lot of ignorance in the West where people may not understand that the last thing the Syrain leadership would do would be to encourage these people anywhere neat their country. Unfortunately the US regime relies on the this ignorance so it can plant ridiculous ideas in people's minds.
Oh and lets remember how effective the US are at policing their own border with Mexico.
by observer393 on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 05:08:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You are correct that the Asad regime has no love for Sunni extremists.  The fact that the Asads are Alawis (a Shi'a tradition) and have worked to crush the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood is testament to that.

My point is not that the Syrian regime has been an active supporter and director of Sunni extremists moving into Iraq and Lebanon.  To encourage them is to let them put roots down in your own country and they definitely don't want that.  One need only look at Pakistan to see how well that works.

As for border control, comparisons to the U.S. are meaningless.  It isn't that the Syrians should be able to control the border (they can't).  However, an autocratic regime built on the support of a strong and often brutal internal security apparatus SHOULD know generally what kinds of people are passing in and out of the country.  If you can't manage that, then you aren't likely to stay in power long (especially when you are an ethnic minority in a majority Sunni country).  So what I am suggesting is that the Syrian government (at some level) was very likely aware of Sunni radicals moving into Lebanon.

The point being that Syria has an interest in seeing the current government in Lebanon fall.  If they can find an agent willing to help that process along, why wouldn't they exploit it.  It lets them deny they were involved and it allows Nasrallah to take power with clean hands.
 

by Hoya90 (hoya90jmk-at-yahoo-dot-com) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 07:15:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So what I am suggesting is that the Syrian government (at some level) was very likely aware of Sunni radicals moving into Lebanon.

Well, and Saddam was aware that Zarqawi was in the country. Only, the US propagandists forgot to mention that he actually wanted Z to be killed, but couldn't get him. Even secret services of police states don't know everything. Another thing is that while US propaganda focused on foreign insurgents and among them on those coming from Syria, in truth more came via Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Same 'failure' there.

It lets them deny they were involved and it allows Nasrallah to take power with clean hands.

The useful idiot version has more clout, but I don't see al-Qaida types willing to be agents for Baath. If Syria used pawns, then more obscure ones. BTW I don't think they would want Nasrallah. Nasrallah is too independent, and even the ties he has are more to Iran than Syria. They would want Berri. (There is a long history of Syrian intrigues to get Hezbollah to accept a minority role in a Shi'a coalition with Amal.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 01:14:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, most propaganda has a grain of truth to make it work.

In general, I believe that Syria was aware of the kinds of people passing through their territory (the regime couldn't survive if it wasn't able to manage that).  That isn't the same as saying that they can shut off the tap or that they are directing the operations.

by Hoya90 (hoya90jmk-at-yahoo-dot-com) on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 07:17:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, most propaganda has a grain of truth to make it work.

Iraqi WMD.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 01:03:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Or even those still in government, who are a murky group themselves albeit pro-US, could benfit from the assassination of a high profile but generally irrelevent player. The assassination certainly supports their claims of plots against them, and will get them further unquestioning western support whereas as things stood they would have probably been forced into an election they couldnt win, and which would have resulted in long overdue democratic reforms that would have furhter empowered the currently grossly underrepresented Shias. This also raises the question of why would Hezbollah or Aoun or Syria for that matter have done it when cruising towards an easy election victory even under the currently unfair system stacked against them.
Then again Israel remains a prime candidate as the assassination further supports their claims that Lebanon is a kind of failed state.
No doubt we will nver know the truth too. After all the Hariri investigation has completely ignored the very plausible explanations that it is more likely he was assassinated over business and mafia dealings than politics, but then again we cannot expect the western media to present alternatives when John Bolton's agenda is there for them to preach.
by observer393 on Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 at 01:50:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series