Display:
That pretty much shows why the debate on global warming still needs different "narratives" in different countries. But I am not convinced that even the Catastrophe angle will work in the USA, and seeing this graph does not do much to boost my confidence.  While India is somewhat of a surprise!
by Nomad on Wed Nov 8th, 2006 at 05:34:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
N India depends almost entirely on Himalayan snowpack for drinking and irrigation water.  nuff said.  they know it's time to be worried.

China's a joker in the pack.  the agrarian countryside is in ongoing intermittent rebellion over corruption, industrial pollution and land abuse, diversion of water resources, etc.   but the urban fringe seems to be drifting into the same la-la consumer fantasyland that much of the affluent industrialised polities now live in:  the Jetsons script is playing well among the Chinese nouveaux riches as previous posts have noted, and the gummint seems deeply split between the Henry Fordists (damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead, carburbs and luxury sedans lead to national pre-eminence) and the worried environmentally conscious planners.

I note that China is busily, hastily developing its own neocolonial periphery to loot, in Africa (see recent frontpage article on China/Africa issues) as the Anglo/Fordist industrial model requires.  its own national resources other than coal are pretty much stripped, and neighbouring states are either armed or already annexed by other powers.

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Wed Nov 8th, 2006 at 07:38:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series