Display:
I'm afraid the stations feed-in points idea is still not viable even with your points. The operational and technical issues in the way are:

  • Trams practically accelerate/brake all the time: short distance between stations, even that interspersed with road crossings and curves, there can be a 'traffic jam' on the line too.
  • Stopping time at stations is short.
  • Unlike cars, rail vehicles (or at least the 'proper' railway vehicles I am more familiar with) often get near maximum continuous power at the maximum permitted speed, that is, braking/accelerating is not such a peak in power use as for cars.

On the other hand, I shall mention that various firms are tinkering with bringing back the fly-wheel, as an energy storage possibility between braking and acceleration at stops.

I'm not aure I understand the point about building power supply across obstacles. Do you mean catenary systems, or also the Bordeaux system?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Dec 14th, 2006 at 04:09:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That was in reference to the Aerobus, where the power supply is with the track, the power train is in the pod that surrounds the track, and the carriage dangles underneath. So rather than bringing the power down to a tram, it brings the vehicle up to the power.

On the other stuff, like I said, electric trains are prosaic for me, while trams are more exotic. If I had been living in Melbun, it probably would have been the other way around.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Dec 14th, 2006 at 04:42:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series