Display:
I don't consider everything FDR did or tried to do as necessarily good, but I'd have to go research more before I could make any decent response on that point.

As far as nationalizing things, I'm not sure it couldn't get very far. States regularly have taken over power utilities for instance with nary a whisper. I.e. I don't think the constitution would outright ban it if there was a good reason to do it.

As for amending being difficult, I consider that a good thing: the crazies who periodically have power (e.g. religious right) can't permanently enshrine horribly bad things in the constitution.

by R343L (reverse qw/ten.cinos@l343r/) on Wed Dec 6th, 2006 at 09:16:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd check what they did on AAA for some background. Not a constitutional lawyer, but seems to me what individual states do is covered under state constitutions unless those run counter to the federal one (with the commerce clause being a big deal).

But here, you run into problems of scale (esp. acute in things like the Great Depression). And in any event, if having a third of Americans malnourished, poorly housed and clothed were not such an event as you describe, then I'd argue that there are no such events.

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant

by redstar on Wed Dec 6th, 2006 at 09:27:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series