European Tribune

Display:
Since the end of WWII all the world has asked of British prime ministers is that they do no harm. (Which is why Eden stands out as bad.) It's sad and ironic that Blair thought the way to be more pro-active in world affairs was to hitch the UK to the US -- sad because of how much real harm it's caused the world, ironic because it ended up discrediting the very idea of UK as a "world power," probably forever.

Still, I'm not sure I can look at this from a British perspective. My impression is that most Brits are rather comfortable with being a seoond-tier country. But from the outside looking in, I'm appalled by Blair's domestic policies as well -- the national IDs, collaboration with extraordinary rendition, racial profiling, all the various "Security" acts that never seem to inspire much opposition.  

At any rate, for all these reasons my vote goes to Blair. Up till now, the UK always managed to muddle through its Edens, Thatchers and Majors, but Blair has caused real and, I believe, permanent damage.

by Matt in NYC on Thu Dec 7th, 2006 at 10:58:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No Matt, you don't understand. It's not a question of being comfortable with being a second-tier nation. It's simply that we know we are the best and do not need all those military and imperial trappings to prove it to other people any more.
by Londonbear on Sat Dec 9th, 2006 at 01:41:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
15 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
18 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
8 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
96 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
2 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
12 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
38 comments

LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 21
50 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series