Display:
  • re the sheer complexity of things (anything really): I’m often amazed at the fact that something works, or how it has come into being at a particular place in a particular form. Peanut butter, a thesis, a Lark, riding a bike, the Commission. Intriguingly chaordic. When you mention holacracy, I think of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardo_Semler. Could this be of use on how to make the Commission more effective?

  • re a bee hive style leader: quite a challenge! Perhaps external stimuli can assist (‘jolt’) manifesting a latent current potential with the Commission. Perhaps such an phenomenon is the only one that save us from a growing gap of irreversible consequences between what’s available now re governance competence and what’s needed now re material world dynamics. Devine intervention?

  • re emergents: interesting also when considering the power of intending, attractors, free will, synchronicity

  • re Art of hosting: perhaps that could bring about a jolt. I would certainly would like to contribute. Perhaps the 40 worried business leaders who wrote to Barroso a while ago and the 80 business leaders who wrote to the Dutch government, would like to join. At some time soon, we could then discuss how we could overcome our -democratic- deficits and lead as described in the original entry

  • re people we should be talking to: people with the quality to inspire others to bring out the best in themselves. Ideally also endowed with a formal position to back this up

  • re So what's first? Or what's next?:
-- locate people as indicated in or near the EC
-- contact them
-- meet
-- make a plan
-- team up with other initiatives. I’d suggest with Diederick & his crowd for starts ( Nanne, Jerome, Rembrandt?)
by emilmoller (emil@beyondthewalls.eu) on Thu Dec 14th, 2006 at 03:48:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Um, OK... A quick rejoinder before bed...

When I mention holacracy, I mean Brian Robertson and Ternary Software.

It's a pity Peter Merry's book evolutionary leadership isn't out in English yet (Sigh) Have you read it in Dutch yet? It addresses two scenarios for change - in the one, you have people in positions of power who can sponsor it, in the other, you have people who care and who feel the itch. They have to follow the imaginal cells scenario and go for it under the radar until they pick up a critical mass. We'd better not wait for leaders. We'd better not get caught behind enemy lines. Don't want martyrs and inquisitions this time round.

Yes to the power of intension, attractors, free will and synchronicity. I can bear witness that they are alive and well and working in the Commission.

You and your jolts. I'm not convinced a jolt will do anything other than frighten people. Climate change is a jolt enough for now. We need to work slowly but surely on our courage and our competence. The Art of Hosting will start small and build. But I'll sit in circle with you any day, Emil. If you want to design something with those business leaders, we can get all our mates together to support it, one way or another. I'm sure the Dutch human emergence guys would come on board.

Is your diederick the same as my diederick (Janse?) If so, good luck finding a date. Those boys are BUSY! But then. So are we, no doubt.

But rest assured that I'm working on all the things in your list of what's next. Let's stay talking.
:-)

by yeshe on Thu Dec 14th, 2006 at 04:11:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Another interesting link, emilmoller, thanks!  From the link.

Attempts to introduce a matrix organisational structure, promoted by Delaware-based consultancy W. L. Gore, failed to achieve desired improvements. Adoption of a lattice structure in 1985 with six to ten workers placed in charge of particular tasks - with a sense of ownership and financial responsibility alike - proved to be very successful as productivity rose and costs fell. While a third of middle managers left between 1985 and 1987, the system became popular with the workers as they received 25 per cent of the profits, allowing many to double or triple their wages with bonuses distributed by a democratically-elected committee.

In the late 1980s, three engineers at SEMCO proposed setting up a Nucleus of Technological Innovation to develop new businesses and product lines which Semler endorsed. At the end of the first six months, NTI had identified 18 such opportunities. Following the success of this initiative, satellite units were encouraged throughout SEMCO. By the late 1980s, these satellite units accounted for two-thirds of its new products and two-thirds of its employees.



Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Fri Dec 15th, 2006 at 04:41:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series