Display:
IHT: The wrong man in Iraq

In selecting Ibrahim al-Jaafari as its nominee for a second prime ministerial term, the dominant Shiite bloc has betrayed the hopes of all those who have wanted Iraq's first constitutionally elected government to make a fresh start at reunifying the country, rebuilding the economy and putting an end to the beating, torture and murder of civilians by Shiite militia members in and out of the official security forces.

Jaafari has been a spectacular failure on all these fronts over the past 10 months. He is unlikely to do a better job if he gets the job a second time, particularly since he owes his selection to a political deal with the followers of Muqtada al-Sadr, a man whose own armed gang, the Mahdi Army, is very much part of the problem.

The Mahdi Army controls the Shiite slums of Baghdad and, with allies, controls the slums of Basra as well, imposing fundamentalist Islamic mores, Taliban style, on those deemed insufficiently devout.

The support of the Sadr bloc was crucial to Jaafari's one-vote victory over a more promising opponent. Sadr's spokesman has already made it clear that the price for those votes will be support for Sadr's political program, which includes solidarity with the governments of Iran and Syria and has inspired Mahdi Army attacks on American and British troops.

Jaafari's nomination by the Shiite bloc is not quite tantamount to his election by the new Parliament. By itself, the bloc controls only 130 of Parliament's 275 seats, while a two-thirds majority is required to approve the new prime minister and the cabinet.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 01:10:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
LOL. Just LOL. The NYT can't get over the American failure to snuff out Sadr, and continues to misrepresent the situation in every way - curiously, emphasizing stuff that would be in the way of - the neocon programme against Iraq's neighbours. Of course, in truth, the occupation-tolerating exile Shi'a parties have much more to do with Iran than the Sadrists, and Mahdi Army attacks weren't inspired by Sadr's political program but Bremer's and Negroponte's amateurish attempts to get Muqtada.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 02:44:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series