Display:
are with us or against us
Now you're channelling King George.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:20:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You know, that was self-derision. I figured it was a pretty obvious way to show that I don't take myself too seriously, and am aware of the dangers of pushing a point too far, but it obviouly failed miserably.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:41:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the context of the rest of your comments on this breakfast thread, you'll have to forgive me for not seeing the self-derision.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:42:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am sad to hear this, and, I must say, deeply offended!

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:51:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll have to say it again.

Forgive me for not seeing the self-derision.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:55:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks. I don't hold grudges (not on ET anyway).

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:59:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is becoming a meta debate on a meta snark.
When Jérôme says he is deeply offended, you can be sure he is joking... I speak under his control, but when  deeply offended, he does not respond at all.

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 07:28:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If I ask you what's wrong with it being a meta debate on a meta snark does that become a meta meta debate on a meta snark?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 07:33:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll admit to taking it seriously for a split second as well, but on the presumption of good intent I took it for what it was after a moments thought.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Feb 15th, 2006 at 05:50:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series