Or c. 11W/m². That is less than a tenth of Si-based solar cells and the best CIS solar cells. Way to go, it seems - but I read that this solution has much potential, the theoretical limit is beyond that of the 30-33% of Si-based solar cells.
not a very good deal when you can get a wind turbine that's a little over a mtr in diameter that generates 400 W for $0.70 per installed watt.
And if you conpare actual energy produced (for wind and solar, the number give in watts is maximum power!), the solar laminate is even worse in comparison. (Taking Germany as standard, average yearly power of a photovoltaic installation is one ninth of maximum power, for a large wind generator it is one fourth, though for small wind less.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Couldn't yet figure out what the significant difference between the two models is. Anyway - assuming 100m² awailable roof surface, that would be about 6290W with the first product and 2540W with the second, giving average powers of 700W and 360W in Germany, the second five-eight times more expensive than four-five 400W wind turbines. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.