Display:
respectfully disagree with your comment that Austro-Prussian War of 1866 was the first one where railroads were a significant factor.  During the American Civil War (1861-1865), both sides used railroads to move division sized units over long distances.

That's significant, but was it decisive? (I'm really asking, am not sure myself.) I note moving of division sized units by railway also happened during the crushing of the 1948/9 revolutions.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Feb 27th, 2006 at 04:39:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You mean 1848 surely?

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Feb 27th, 2006 at 04:52:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
D'oh! Silly typo, thanks for spotting.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Feb 27th, 2006 at 04:54:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In short: Yes.
by ATinNM on Mon Feb 27th, 2006 at 07:20:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 . . . in American Civil War, and they are hard to untangle, as they worked together.  

Railroads are certainly on this list.  

Nor was the importance of railroads neglected at the time.  Opponent's railways, when they could not be taken over, were routinely ripped up.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Tue Feb 28th, 2006 at 11:43:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, for example there was the Great Locomotive Chase (real events turned inside out by Buster Keaton's The General).

After doing some read-up, I submit that railways were decisive in the American Civil War, particularly the 1864 campaigns.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Mar 1st, 2006 at 10:15:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series