Display:
I wouldn't use the word Civil War myself, but there is a fracture. I mean, between those who wish to move towards a more progressive society (while retaining core Islamic values, as, as much the US is a Christian Nation) and those who remain mired in a static, dogmatic past.

The fracture "explodes" when the past-lovers feel (rightly so) threatened that their world is crumbling, is being eroded by the contagion of the forces of modernity.  They then lash back.

It happened before and it will surely happen again, repeatedly, as the Musalim world grows increasingly connected with the rest of the planet.

(I'm not entirely without first-hand knowledge, through friends from North Africa and having written a series of stories featuring the Ottoman hero Dragut.)

 

by Lupin on Sun Feb 5th, 2006 at 12:59:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm seeing your point more clearly now. I agree.

But I think, also, it is important to remember that this kind of tension takes a long time to resolve and will have to occur from Islamic folks arguing it out amongst themselves and reaching some new kind of consensus that makes sense with them their cultural traditions. I don't think you'd disagree.

by Ben P (wbp@u.washington.edu) on Mon Feb 6th, 2006 at 04:25:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is basically what has happened in China, Japan, etc. and is to some extent happening right now in Latin Europe. And for that matter Europe and the US also.

Change often leads to reaction, which I think the rise of the Chrisitan right and political conservatism, more generally, is as well. In many ways, I see this trend as a similar - albeit much milder - result of increased globalization, mediatization (?), "connectedness," erosion of community autonomy and isolation, etc..

by Ben P (wbp@u.washington.edu) on Mon Feb 6th, 2006 at 04:28:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series