Display:
There's been vigorous debate on the issue. One side is arguing that because attacks on Islam are being used as a cover for racism, even ambiguous images should be avoided, though not banned. The other side is arguing that since this has been framed by the protesters as primarily a religious issue, all ambiguity has been removed and thus the publishing of the images deserves an unconditional defense.

I agree with the latter argument, but I do think the first group has a legitimate argument. In any case debate is interesting and helps us question our views, even if it rarely changes them. It's a useful and enjoyable exercize, though sometimes emotions run high.  Certainly no reason to feel like slamming the door on Eurotrib.

by MarekNYC on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 03:46:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You put it perfectly.

Although my take is that the images should be avoided in the same measure than other images that attack jews and catholics are avoided...The bar should be raised or the diminshed at the same time. Just to point out more clearly :)

I love your post.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 04:00:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd say that the debate has been excellent all around, because we are discussing fundamental issues, there is genuine disagreement between us, but serious - and polite - arguments on each side.

That I care more about one side of the arguments today does not mean that I do not care about the arguments from the other side.

Personally, I am glad that such an intense debate could take place with almost no irrevocably nasty words written. But this is probably not over yet...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Feb 4th, 2006 at 05:35:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm in awe of how you managed to condense this entire debate into a few sentences. That's a true skill.

To me, this entire debate flows from freedom of speech. It's a positive thing that there is such a vigorous debate going on here. If it were not, we all would be reduced to pundits professing the same "wisdom" and preach to the choir. There are enough of those out on the net; in fact ET partly stands up to them. If any, this debate proves why everyone should stick to ET.

by Nomad on Sun Feb 5th, 2006 at 09:31:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series