Display:
From San Francisco Chronicle

A particle accelerator at Sandia National Laboratories has heated a swarm of charged particles to a record 2 billion degrees Kelvin, a temperature beyond that of a star's interior.

Wow.  That'll get your buns nice and toasty.

[Sandia's Z machine]... normally passes 20 million amps of electrical current through a cluster of tungsten wires about the size of a spool of thread. The massive electrical pulse instantly vaporizes the wires into a cloud of charged, superhot particles known as plasma.

At the same time, the Z machine compresses the plasma in a powerful magnetic field. Almost instantly, the particles smash together in a collision that can emit temperatures in the millions of degrees.

Sandia boosted the Z machine's output into the billions of degrees in part by substituting steel wires around a larger, coffee cup-sized core. Increasing the size of the core increased the distance the ions traveled, giving them more time to gain velocity and therefore energy.

But the larger core did not account for all the heat generated in the collision. It also could not explain why the plasma particles did not stop moving once they collided with one another -- for about 10 billionths of a second, some unknown energy caused them to keep pushing back against the magnetic field.  [emphasis added]

WTF, over?

Haines theorized that the energy of the Z machine's magnetic field itself added energy to the particles.

This is exciting news.  Any of you physicist types know about these experiments?

by ATinNM on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 03:03:34 PM EST
a collision that can emit temperatures in the millions of degrees
Huh?

I'll try to read the article and make sense of it...

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 03:06:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Skip the SF Chronicle and go directly to Sandia's own press release if you're interested.

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 03:10:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Sandia release is a bit bombastic for me, too.

Temperatures hotter than the interiors of stars

The interior of stars, man... in the core of a heavy star in the final stages of its development, by the time Si burning sets in, temperature is higher than that - the iron core that forms in the end (before the supernova explosion) can get to 10 billion K. Granted, such a state doesn't last for longer than a day or two, but if a neutron star is born in the process, its core temperature will be in the same range.

But if we are talking normal (main-sequence) stars, the Sun's core is probably 15 million K, the heaviest O stars would have one around 50 million K - now that is too low for comparison, tokamaks like JET exceeded that already by an order of magnitude.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 04:27:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think there's any new (fundamental) physics involved, it's quite possible that the models used to predict the output were simplified. After all, turbulent maghetohydrodynamics is harder than General Relativity. From Sandia:
Haines theorized that the rapid conversion of magnetic energy to a very high ion plasma temperature was achieved by unexpected instabilities at the point of ordinary stagnation: that is, the point at which ions and electrons should have been unable to travel further. The plasma should have collapsed, its internal energy radiated away. But for approximately 10 nanoseconds, some unknown energy was still pushing back against the magnetic field.

Haines' explanation theorizes that Z's magnetic energies create microturbulences that increase the kinetic energies of ions caught in the field's grip. Already hot, the extra jolt of kinetic energy then produces increased heat, as ions and their accompanying electrons release energy through friction-like viscous mixing even after they should have been exhausted.

High temperatures previously had been assumed to be produced entirely by the kinetic flight and intersection of ions and electrons, unaided by accompanying microturbulent fields.

I would guess there was some sort of symmetry assumption built into the theoretical (numerical) calculations.

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 03:16:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
After all, turbulent maghetohydrodynamics is harder than General Relativity.

Yeah... and if you have to combine the two...

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 03:57:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suspect the fastest way to calculate a supernova explosion is to let it happen ;-)

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 04:12:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ah, supernova explosions are tame: I was thinking of gamma-ray bursts and quasars...

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 04:28:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Do we even know what causes those?

tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 04:34:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Gamma-ray bursts? When I looked at the issue the last time, super-heavy stars collapsing into a black hole (which is a non-isotropic collapse) looked like themost promising model - but things change so fast in this field that I am probably behind the news.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 04:42:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A critical mass of railway diaries was the last theory I read...
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Sat Mar 11th, 2006 at 04:42:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
52 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
32 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
32 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
52 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
1 comment

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
9 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series