European Tribune

Display:
I went to a lecture last night about immigration into the U.S. from Mexico. It was an acceptably left-wing discussion with all the appropriate anti-Bush sidebars, but the main point was that the big problem is the dumping of subsidized farm produce (mostly corn/maize). That puts the Mexican farmers out of business and they look for work in the U.S.

The European approach was used several times as an example of "how to do it right." One example was Portugal, with a poor economy that has been subsidized by the rest of the E.U. Also mentioned was the freedom of labor mobility between countries in the E.U. In contrast, NAFTA allows the movement of capital but prevents labor from moving, which causes the illegal immigration problems.

So the bottom line was that globalization itself is good, but you have to do it right--like the Europeans. That's the message from the left in the U.S.

by asdf on Wed Mar 15th, 2006 at 11:23:56 PM EST
Well, I would basically agree that the EU arrangement gives more stability than NAFTA and indeed it is better for the "poor partner" than NAFTA by a long way.

Not sure it's a model for all of globalisation though, so far it works best on a more local scale. It's not going to be the right approach to solve US-China trade anytime soon.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Thu Mar 16th, 2006 at 02:37:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
After Democracy
by marco - Dec 3
28 comments

Not quite the 'perfect fix'?
by djhabakkuk - Dec 3
2 comments

Bugger Thy Neighbour
by redstar - Dec 3
104 comments

Beggar Thy Neighbour
by redstar - Dec 3
58 comments

Friedmanite Folly and the Mugabe Option
by ChrisCook - Dec 2
42 comments

On Rhetoric
by rg - Dec 3
14 comments

Obama commits to Middle East peace
by shergald - Dec 2
5 comments

Did the U.S. 2005 Bankruptcy Reform cause the world financial ...
by NBBooks - Dec 2
8 comments

Recent Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series