Display:
As you know I'm slowly making my way through the classics of economics. Should I skip the marginalists and go straight to Keynes?

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 17th, 2006 at 12:10:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ever consider writing up book reviews/reports/notes for us as you go?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 17th, 2006 at 12:13:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
More diaries...

I am not particularly interested in reviewing Adam Smith, but I'd definitely go for a review of John Stuart Mill's Principles of Political Economy and Chapters on Socialism.

I should probably also review 50 major economists, which I read a few months ago.

You keep giving me more and more ET work.. Poor Barbara.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 17th, 2006 at 12:32:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, the marginalists are important, and Keynes is an extension of their work.  I wouldn't skip them.  Nor would I skip the early-20th-Century Classicalists, like Marshall and Pigou, because those are the two men Keynes was critiquing in Book I.  I've never seen a Pigou book outside of a library, but you might have better luck in Britain.  Also, Mises is a terrible writer, but important, nonetheless.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Fri Mar 17th, 2006 at 12:27:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series