Display:
The unions generally raise the standards for everyone, which is why people tend to think they're net good for most people. I don't think it works that was in the US ... partially because the unions' concerns aren't codified in law but are reflected in local contracts that may only apply to union members(?).
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Mar 20th, 2006 at 11:03:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In Europe unions are likely to take progressive political positions outside their main area of concern, which is collective bargaining in their sector. In the US unions are purely out to defend the interests of their members, progressive politics be damned. One example that struck me was that some union or professional association of American prison guards was vocally in favour of tough-on-crime policies leading to more incarcerations and hence more jobs for them. This goes beyond collective bargaining into influencing social policy in decidedy non-progressive ways (especially given how the criminal justice system is stacked against minorities and the poor), and is something I could not imagine a European union doing.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 20th, 2006 at 11:11:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series