Display:
Actually, to me it points up, once again that this is a test based around the US consensus.

As an example of a question like this:

"Public broadcasters should never receive moeny from the state." (I can't remember the exact wording.)

In the UK at least, whilst there is a set of people who are so anti-BBC they might vote "Strongly Agree" it is practically assured that most people will vote "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" because the number of people who believe that the BBC should get NO state funding is very small. The problem is, this question does nothing to discriminate (for example) between Tories, Lib Dems, Labour and SWP in the UK, but it will clearly put US Dems in the left and US Repubs on the right because this is something they have a sharp disagreement about.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Mar 21st, 2006 at 01:01:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It would get a certain amount of sympathy here I suspect.

In any case, it's meant to be global. The Tories haven't been all that far right traditionally.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 21st, 2006 at 01:03:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not saying that it's a true "unthinkable" in the UK context, just that it's really not the level of discriminator that it is in the US context. And I think that's true for a lot of the questions. If you sit with them and think carefully about European society then it's hard to be "Strongly Agree/Disagree" with the way they have phrased their economic questions.
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Mar 21st, 2006 at 01:08:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series