Display:
Well, the selection effect actually chimes with Atlantic Review's recent observation that it's only the US rightwingers that have an interest in European views and affairs.

i.e. The graph of the community is largely accurate, so long as you extrapolate up from 130 to a bigger number and realise there are enough outliers on the right to make a conversation.

Atlantic Review's experience is it's only those on the right who really read/comment on European issues (and I would argue on foreign affairs generally.) Since those are the diaries we actually look at, it follows that we would experience a more "rightward" dKos than we would expect.

Dammit, I should really write a diary for him, but I think his deadline is too tight at this time.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Mar 21st, 2006 at 02:05:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why is it only those on the right that care about European issues? Is it because progressives are isolationists, or too busy worrying their domestic problems (and who can blame them)?.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 21st, 2006 at 02:16:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, it's his theory, not mine (and indeed I'm not sure if I buy it completely, although his anecdotal data is quite compelling) so I don't know if I'm a good person to answer this.

With that caveat:

  1. Part of it certainly is that a lot on the left are isolationist. Some are just in the historical US tradition of isolation, other are that way in reaction to the sheer tawdryness of US foreign adventures from REagan onwards.

  2. In terms of dKos diaries, some are just too busy, I know I can barely keep up with the diaries here on ET, so this is a serious effect.

  3. Sometimes good people just say little when they have little to say, whilst the emptier cans rattle louder.

  4. There is a definite sense that the Repubs have managed to make "cheese eating surrender economists" politcally toxic in the US. Thus, there's a reluctance to be seen supporting multilateralism or European style economics. It's unAmerican! Under such unconscious pressure, sometimes people just go quiet.

I think (4) is a big one. The US is filled with pronouncements about life in Europe. It's hard to see how you could live in that atmosphere and then argue "we need to pull the good things out of the European model and implement them here." It's even harder in the foreign policy arena I suspect.
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Mar 21st, 2006 at 02:45:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Wasn't the Atlantic review issue only concerned with US/German relations ?

Politics has to be relevant and comprehensible. Foreign politics, like domestic politics, are only meaningful in so far as they impact you as an individual. So berating citizens of one country for being disinterested in the politics of countries with minimal impact on their life is kinda beside the point. I doubt the British have much more awareness of German politics than Americans do.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Mar 23rd, 2006 at 05:15:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series