Display:
That thought struck me also.

In some US states they have "employment at will" which is a vastly less secure state than the proposals outlined here.

UK employees in small companies are pretty insecure too. There are laws about replacement, but precious few about "downsizing."

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Mon Mar 6th, 2006 at 02:38:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"At will" employment is the overwhelming norm in the U.S., not limited to a subset of states. The European type of employment contract is rare.
by asdf on Mon Mar 6th, 2006 at 08:04:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hm, do you have figures on that?

Whilst it is true that "European contracts" are not used often, I have seen reports that "at will" is not even a majority of the US workforce these days.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Mar 7th, 2006 at 03:40:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think you are confusing "at will" employment with something else. Even executives have contracts that specifically spell out that they can quit at any time, and they can be fired without cause at any time. The only significant exception to this is unionized labor, which is a pretty small part of the overall workforce.

And I don't know of any American company that has worker representation on the board of directors. There might be a few exceptions, but they would be in the extreme minority.

We simply accept the fact that the boss can (and will) fire you at any time, and the boss accepts that you can (and will) quit at any time.

by asdf on Tue Mar 7th, 2006 at 11:14:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series