Display:
First of all you would have a very hard time convincing me that the Western European press, including the right wing press, is biased towards Berlusconi - from what I can tell they can't stand the guy and were rooting for his defeat.  Secondly, while I do think that the different headline would be the one you suggest, there's a perfectly innocent explanation - expectations. During the run up to the elections polls consistently predicted a narrow but clear victory by the left, the exit polls said that that is what probably happened as well. Then there was a period of uncertainty followed by the actual results: a wafer thin majority. So the left did a bit worse than expected, Berlusconi a bit better. If he had managed to pull out a victory that would have been the big news - hence the hypothetical headline. Lower down there would, I assure you, have been plenty of speculation as to his ability to govern given the narrowness of his victory. There was certainly a lot of that with Berlusconi's much clearer victory in the previous elections. Finally, paralysis and chaos - it is a serious danger given the heterogenity of the coalition which from what I can tell includes everything from center right types who can't stand Berlusconi to the very hard left. So all in all, nothing to get upset about. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
by MarekNYC on Tue Apr 11th, 2006 at 10:55:46 AM EST
<blockquote>from what I can tell they can't stand the guy and were rooting for his defeat</blockquote>
No, they were extremely happy to have him in charge as a perennial source of silly international diatribes and useless gossip, while Italy was put "back in its place" as a de-facto colony of northern Europe. Their critiques were just too easy to write. Now they'll have to work a bit harder :)

Just a sidenote on the "paralysis and chaos": given the angry reactions fron the right, if there's going to be trouble it will certainly come from those quarters more than from the left, as people do remember what Bertinotti obtained by rocking the boat the first time around (that is, nothing). Lega Nord did the same mistake with the first Berlusconi-led government, and they were very cautious not to repeat the mistake the second time. You can expect the same from centre-left parties, especially seeing these results. There will be noise and "ado" all over while defining the government,  as it always happens, but after that, I expect a few years of quiet work.

by toyg (g.lacava@gmail.com) on Tue Apr 11th, 2006 at 11:48:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd add "de facto colony of the United States" along with GB. In foreign policy and Euro bashing the two go hand in hand. B has always said he is more American than the Americans and like any good paranoid "he knows what America needs and wants before America does."

Magical thought goes a long way with demagogues.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Wed Apr 12th, 2006 at 02:01:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I know what you mean, and I disagree.

The comments about paralysis, about the need for a caretaker government, about the risk for "serious economic reform" and the other points I make would NOT have been made about Berlusconi. Yes you'd have had comments about the unexpected come back, but not these aspertions on his victory.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Apr 11th, 2006 at 06:31:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I've crossposted the diary now: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/4/11/184211/149

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Apr 11th, 2006 at 07:19:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series