Display:
Racism needs no proof. They can make it up anytime.

Lemme refine this. Racism can also operate with proof - by turning the particular into the general. "some X did Y" becomes "X do Y". And unless members of X are 100% innocents, racism will always find examples to reinforce the theory.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Apr 14th, 2006 at 06:52:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Lemme refine this. Racism can also operate with proof - by turning the particular into the general. "some X did Y" becomes "X do Y". And unless members of X are 100% innocents, racism will always find examples to reinforce the theory.

You are talking about generalizing here, "if one is bad, all are bad". We have statistics to prove whether that is right or wrong.

Be careful! Is it classified?
by darin (dkaloyanov[at]gmail.com) on Sat Apr 15th, 2006 at 07:10:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
None of your sweeping generalising statements I flagged were based in statistics. And statistics is irrelevant, at least if you try to equate "more of X do Y than of Z" with "all/most X do Y", as you do with crime statistics below.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Apr 17th, 2006 at 05:18:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact I've provided statistics (I've linked to Worldpress article) and commented that they are important.

Be careful! Is it classified?
by darin (dkaloyanov[at]gmail.com) on Tue Apr 18th, 2006 at 04:08:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not for what I flagged as sweeping statements, I repeat.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Apr 18th, 2006 at 06:40:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Provide a couple of the most shocking for you and I will try to provide links (or/and will translate).

Be careful! Is it classified?
by darin (dkaloyanov[at]gmail.com) on Tue Apr 18th, 2006 at 12:36:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series