Display:
  1. I can't see any legal restraining value. Now the law has been signed, any employer can write his/her own CPE, assuming a job candidate accepts one.

  2. Parliament's legitimacy is that Chirac is, to all intents and purposes, sending the CPE back for reconsideration, so it's Parliament that will write the new version, and Parliament is run by the UMP, so the UMP gets to define the new version, so Sarkozy... etc... The problems you raise are important, but more moral than constitutional/political.

  3. If Villepin were capable of understanding parliamentary/electoral and consultative democracy, he wouldn't be in this mess. He's a pure product of the elitist system that, under the present constitution, does not require a PM to have any electoral legitimacy. He advised Chirac to call that disastrous election in 1997. He thinks he's some kind of Napoleon figure, and that that is what France wants. He's so far from reality that it's impossible to say what his reading of the situation is right now.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Apr 3rd, 2006 at 06:28:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. I see in Le Monde that they will not print the forms necessary to sign a CPE to prevent them from beign used. How pathetic is that? (I don't even know if it would work legally, but it might in practise)

  2. True. And as a comment to your other point above on 49.3, the power of parliament is often underestimated in France. Cohabitation showed that it is parliament who decides who governs, and it is stable (I did not expect, back in 1997, Jospin to fulfill the 5 year mandate).

  3. Also true, but I still don't see how he can stay in place as a totally discredited PM - unless he still hope to claim the benefits if this is solved to the right's satisfaction (whether immediately if the protests peter out or indirectly if there is a delayed reaction to la chienlit).


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Apr 3rd, 2006 at 06:59:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't even know if it would work legally, but it might in practise
I'll let you write that law if you let me write the regulation, as we say in Spain.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 3rd, 2006 at 07:01:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"they will not print the forms necessary to sign a CPE "

Yeah, they said so, but it's pure bullshit: you don't need a form to sign a contract. Any employer can write one on plain paper, as usual. If it has the basic information on salary, working time... and if it's signed by the employee, it's legal.

 

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

by Melanchthon on Mon Apr 3rd, 2006 at 07:07:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Right -- as I said above. An employer only needs write a contract in accordance with the law.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Apr 3rd, 2006 at 07:09:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. See Melanchthon's comment below (no need for a printed form)

  2. I think cohabitation showed that the president can't rule against the parliamentary majority. Not that parliament decides who is the government, that's slightly different.

  3. I suppose Villepin and Chirac are still hoping the fuss will die down and they will then claim they "stood firm". But Sarko has the initiative now, and any improvement in the situation will be to his credit. In other words, V and C now go around with big shotgun holes in both feet.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Apr 3rd, 2006 at 07:17:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series