Display:
In English.

There is one strange thing in this press release.

Att riksdagen beslutar om stödsystemet är en viktig förutsättning för att projekten skall kunna genomföras eftersom endast vissa vattenkraftprojekt bedöms kunna genomföras affärsmässigt utan elcertifikat.

or, in English:

An important precondition for the implementation of the projects is that parliament approves the support system, as it is estimated that it will only be possible to realise some of the hydro power projects on a commercial basis without electricity certificates.

This can mean either:

1) Without the subsidies only some hydroelectric projects are viable. That is, the wind is not viable without support.

or

2) Without the subsidies only some of the hydroelectric projects are viable (while other hydroelectric projects are not), while wind is viable without subsidies.

I am afraid alternative 2 is the correct one.

Maybe I should mail or call Vattenfall?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri May 19th, 2006 at 08:58:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course I meant I am afraid alternative 1 is the correct one!

And I meant "premature closing" not "premature losing" in the above comment.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri May 19th, 2006 at 09:02:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series